It seemed worthwhile to study the comments legal writing instructors put on students\u27 papers and ask the readers of those comments - the students themselves - which comments were the most useful. This article describes such a study that was conducted by the author using students and faculty at the University of Puget Sound School of Law. The results should be useful to new legal writing faculty who are striving to learn how to critique their students\u27 writing effectively, as well as to experienced legal writing faculty who are interested in whether the conventional wisdom about critiquing is borne out when examined from the student\u27s perspective
We now know that many experienced lawyers think newly-minted attorneys “do not write well.”1 Law pro...
This article develops the theory behind and practice of written analytical feedback on student writi...
Applying the perspective of the reader to the craft of writing, Legal Writing for Legal Readers teac...
It seemed worthwhile to study the comments legal writing instructors put on students\u27 papers and ...
While there are some differences of opinion about what is the best way to comment on and grade law s...
This Article, written by the five-person faculty in the legal research and writing program at Wester...
• “[E]xperts agree that providing written individual feedback on law students ’ papers is [perhaps] ...
The extreme performance anxiety of first-year law students along with the alien experience of receiv...
To fine-tune legal writing courses to better prepare law students to enter legal practice, Professor...
In an age in which writing-software programs tout formative feedback on student papers and advertise...
(Excerpt) After nearly fifteen years of teaching first-year and upper-level legal writing courses an...
There is a tendency to view scholarly writing by law students as an exercise that has little utility...
This article concerns the value of teaching employed law students about the potency of “impactful le...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
Critiquing student writing is an important responsibility of many law professors. While the focus of...
We now know that many experienced lawyers think newly-minted attorneys “do not write well.”1 Law pro...
This article develops the theory behind and practice of written analytical feedback on student writi...
Applying the perspective of the reader to the craft of writing, Legal Writing for Legal Readers teac...
It seemed worthwhile to study the comments legal writing instructors put on students\u27 papers and ...
While there are some differences of opinion about what is the best way to comment on and grade law s...
This Article, written by the five-person faculty in the legal research and writing program at Wester...
• “[E]xperts agree that providing written individual feedback on law students ’ papers is [perhaps] ...
The extreme performance anxiety of first-year law students along with the alien experience of receiv...
To fine-tune legal writing courses to better prepare law students to enter legal practice, Professor...
In an age in which writing-software programs tout formative feedback on student papers and advertise...
(Excerpt) After nearly fifteen years of teaching first-year and upper-level legal writing courses an...
There is a tendency to view scholarly writing by law students as an exercise that has little utility...
This article concerns the value of teaching employed law students about the potency of “impactful le...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
Critiquing student writing is an important responsibility of many law professors. While the focus of...
We now know that many experienced lawyers think newly-minted attorneys “do not write well.”1 Law pro...
This article develops the theory behind and practice of written analytical feedback on student writi...
Applying the perspective of the reader to the craft of writing, Legal Writing for Legal Readers teac...