The modern jury focuses on three main ideas: impartiality, as laid out in the Sixth Amendment, jury of one’s peers, stemming from the Magna Carta, and a jury that represents a fair cross-section of the community. The cross-section idea has been developed by case law, but originates from the Sixth Amendment, under the belief that jury selection that does not systematically discriminate against members of the community and has a jury pool represents a cross-section of the community is likely to be impartial. Jurors are likely to draw upon their own experiences when deliberating, so having a variety of experiences and perspectives can make for a more well-balanced discussion. An additional hope is that when selecting from a cross-section, it m...
This comment explores ways in which racial bias undermines the American jury system and argues that ...
This Article examines the use of the sixth amendment to challenge the composition of a jury. The aut...
Court reformers continue to debate over efforts to select juries more diverse than are typically ach...
The modern jury focuses on three main ideas: impartiality, as laid out in the Sixth Amendment, jury ...
Impartiality is both elusive and important for the legitimacy of the jury and its decisions. After p...
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right of criminal defendants to...
One of the main and ongoing problems plaguing the American jury system has been ensuring that juries...
As illustrated by the recent Los Angeles riots, communities perceive bias in the judicial system whe...
The jury system is intended to instill fairness and increase confidence in the American legal system...
Racial and ethnic minorities continue to be substantially underrepresented on criminal juries. At al...
Discrimination in the jury system has been a matter of constitutional and ethical concern at least s...
The Supreme Court faced an important ideological choice when it banned the racial use of peremptory ...
The civil jury, though constitutionally protected by the seventh amendment, has remained a controver...
The criminal defendant\u27s right to inquire into the possible racial and ethnic prejudices of prosp...
Of the various selection methods that contribute to the underrepresentation of members of racial and...
This comment explores ways in which racial bias undermines the American jury system and argues that ...
This Article examines the use of the sixth amendment to challenge the composition of a jury. The aut...
Court reformers continue to debate over efforts to select juries more diverse than are typically ach...
The modern jury focuses on three main ideas: impartiality, as laid out in the Sixth Amendment, jury ...
Impartiality is both elusive and important for the legitimacy of the jury and its decisions. After p...
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right of criminal defendants to...
One of the main and ongoing problems plaguing the American jury system has been ensuring that juries...
As illustrated by the recent Los Angeles riots, communities perceive bias in the judicial system whe...
The jury system is intended to instill fairness and increase confidence in the American legal system...
Racial and ethnic minorities continue to be substantially underrepresented on criminal juries. At al...
Discrimination in the jury system has been a matter of constitutional and ethical concern at least s...
The Supreme Court faced an important ideological choice when it banned the racial use of peremptory ...
The civil jury, though constitutionally protected by the seventh amendment, has remained a controver...
The criminal defendant\u27s right to inquire into the possible racial and ethnic prejudices of prosp...
Of the various selection methods that contribute to the underrepresentation of members of racial and...
This comment explores ways in which racial bias undermines the American jury system and argues that ...
This Article examines the use of the sixth amendment to challenge the composition of a jury. The aut...
Court reformers continue to debate over efforts to select juries more diverse than are typically ach...