A perennial debate in higher education in general, and in legal education in particular, is whether a robust scholarly life helps or hurts a professor’s teaching performance. Taking inspiration from panelist Jim Lindgren’s work, Are Scholars Better Teachers?, which concludes that better scholars are perceived by students to be better teachers, Caron asks a panel, “Are Scholars Better Bloggers?” These comments explore both scholarship and blogging data to begin to answer that question
Is legal blogging an antidote to the hyper-scholasticism that sometimes characterizes the legal acad...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
This paper\u27s focus is on today’s technology and ask whether blogs as we know them today are condu...
Legal academics like to think that everything they write is scholarly. There is no surer way to offe...
Unbeknownst to most of us outside the legal academy, there apparently is some disagreement over whet...
Now, more than ever before, we legal academics have to, at least in some measure, choose. Should we ...
Commenting on the papers by Doug Berman Lawrence Solumn, this paper raises questions concerning the ...
This paper makes the case that generally, bloggership should be treated as a form of service for adm...
Does blogging have anything to do with legal scholarship? Could blogging transform the legal acade...
While some law blogging is serious scholarship—and more could be serious scholarship than is now—alm...
Writing promotion and tenure letters is an important service to the academy, albeit one that is seld...
This essay focuses on the relationship between academic weblogs, or blogs, and journalism. I see aca...
Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blog...
Is legal blogging an antidote to the hyper-scholasticism that sometimes characterizes the legal acad...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
This paper\u27s focus is on today’s technology and ask whether blogs as we know them today are condu...
Legal academics like to think that everything they write is scholarly. There is no surer way to offe...
Unbeknownst to most of us outside the legal academy, there apparently is some disagreement over whet...
Now, more than ever before, we legal academics have to, at least in some measure, choose. Should we ...
Commenting on the papers by Doug Berman Lawrence Solumn, this paper raises questions concerning the ...
This paper makes the case that generally, bloggership should be treated as a form of service for adm...
Does blogging have anything to do with legal scholarship? Could blogging transform the legal acade...
While some law blogging is serious scholarship—and more could be serious scholarship than is now—alm...
Writing promotion and tenure letters is an important service to the academy, albeit one that is seld...
This essay focuses on the relationship between academic weblogs, or blogs, and journalism. I see aca...
Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blog...
Is legal blogging an antidote to the hyper-scholasticism that sometimes characterizes the legal acad...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...