Now, more than ever before, we legal academics have to, at least in some measure, choose. Should we spend the bulk of our time discovering, with the reputational, professional, and emotional benefits that this produces? Or should we spend more of the time disseminating, mostly disseminating views that are our own but are based on others’ discoveries, with the very different reputational, professional, and emotional benefits that this produces? Sure, it’s our choice, at least once we have tenure. But how should we exercise that choice? Yes, we’re probably better off both discovering and disseminating, if we’re good at both and enjoy both. But how much of both
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
This paper\u27s focus is on today’s technology and ask whether blogs as we know them today are condu...
Legal academics like to think that everything they write is scholarly. There is no surer way to offe...
A perennial debate in higher education in general, and in legal education in particular, is whether ...
Does blogging have anything to do with legal scholarship? Could blogging transform the legal acade...
Writing promotion and tenure letters is an important service to the academy, albeit one that is seld...
Commenting on the papers by Doug Berman Lawrence Solumn, this paper raises questions concerning the ...
While some law blogging is serious scholarship—and more could be serious scholarship than is now—alm...
Unbeknownst to most of us outside the legal academy, there apparently is some disagreement over whet...
This essay focuses on the relationship between academic weblogs, or blogs, and journalism. I see aca...
This paper makes the case that generally, bloggership should be treated as a form of service for adm...
Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blog...
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
This paper\u27s focus is on today’s technology and ask whether blogs as we know them today are condu...
Legal academics like to think that everything they write is scholarly. There is no surer way to offe...
A perennial debate in higher education in general, and in legal education in particular, is whether ...
Does blogging have anything to do with legal scholarship? Could blogging transform the legal acade...
Writing promotion and tenure letters is an important service to the academy, albeit one that is seld...
Commenting on the papers by Doug Berman Lawrence Solumn, this paper raises questions concerning the ...
While some law blogging is serious scholarship—and more could be serious scholarship than is now—alm...
Unbeknownst to most of us outside the legal academy, there apparently is some disagreement over whet...
This essay focuses on the relationship between academic weblogs, or blogs, and journalism. I see aca...
This paper makes the case that generally, bloggership should be treated as a form of service for adm...
Written in the form of a blog, this paper highlights the creative and communicative benefits of blog...
While the blogosphere has always included sites by students, professors, librarians, administrators ...
Evaluating the limitations and benefits of blogging as a form of legal scholarship, this paper ultim...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...