The recognition of the Bivens-style action, or the constitutional tort, has been followed by the Supreme Court\u27s recent assertion that these actions will be unavailable where Congress has established an elaborate remedial scheme that should not be augmented by a judicial remedy. The author of this article posits that this necessary limitation on Bivens actions may produce an ironic result in the area of public personnel. The author reasons that those employees whom Congress has determined warrant no statutory protection may be permitted to pursue more lucrative judicial remedies than those employees whom Congress has sought to protect. The author examines the development of the constitutional tort and explores the possible Bivens actions...
Litigation challenging the national security actions of the federal government has taken a seemingly...
In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. S...
This brief piece responds to Carlos M. Vázquez & Stephen I. Vladeck, State Law, the Westfall Act, an...
The recognition of the Bivens-style action, or the constitutional tort, has been followed by the Sup...
n Bivens, the Supreme Court held that although 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is silent as to its application to f...
As a result of the Supreme Court\u27s 1983 decision in Bush v. Lucas, federal employees are not perm...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decision to place liability on federal officials in ...
Part I of this Article demonstrates that the Court\u27s approach to congressional remedial schemes h...
Until the Supreme Court\u27s 1971 decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bure...
In Part I of this Article, Chappell and Bush are analyzed against the backdrop of the preceding Bive...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narco...
Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ c...
This Essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decis...
This Note argues that the federal courts retain power to furnish equitable relief for constitutional...
In its most recent decision narrowly construing Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau...
Litigation challenging the national security actions of the federal government has taken a seemingly...
In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. S...
This brief piece responds to Carlos M. Vázquez & Stephen I. Vladeck, State Law, the Westfall Act, an...
The recognition of the Bivens-style action, or the constitutional tort, has been followed by the Sup...
n Bivens, the Supreme Court held that although 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is silent as to its application to f...
As a result of the Supreme Court\u27s 1983 decision in Bush v. Lucas, federal employees are not perm...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decision to place liability on federal officials in ...
Part I of this Article demonstrates that the Court\u27s approach to congressional remedial schemes h...
Until the Supreme Court\u27s 1971 decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bure...
In Part I of this Article, Chappell and Bush are analyzed against the backdrop of the preceding Bive...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narco...
Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ c...
This Essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decis...
This Note argues that the federal courts retain power to furnish equitable relief for constitutional...
In its most recent decision narrowly construing Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau...
Litigation challenging the national security actions of the federal government has taken a seemingly...
In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. S...
This brief piece responds to Carlos M. Vázquez & Stephen I. Vladeck, State Law, the Westfall Act, an...