Add to ORKGThe purpose of this note is to emphasize that while the dual sovereignty doctrine is legally sound in its application to successive prosecutions by different states, care must be taken to prevent abuse of the doctrine. This note proposes that individual states develop consistent policies to deal with the unique situation in which the facts of the case allow for the possibility of successive prosecutions. By doing this, the states can assure that the operation of the doctrine will not result in an injustice to the defendant
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
In Gamble v. United States, the defendant questioned the constitutionality of the dual sovereignty d...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
The purpose of this note is to emphasize that while the dual sovereignty doctrine is legally sound i...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
The Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause is an analytically gnarly beast. What seems like a fairly ...
Today, it is quite possible for a criminal defendant who has violated the laws of several countries ...
This Article offers a coherent way of thinking about double jeopardy rules among sovereigns. Its the...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and ...
In this case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, petitioner Gamble\u27s brief demonstrates that...
The dual-sovereignty doctrine is a significant carve-out to the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Cl...
This article analyzes the U. S. constitutional law interpreting the concept of “same offence.” Inclu...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
In Gamble v. United States, the defendant questioned the constitutionality of the dual sovereignty d...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
The purpose of this note is to emphasize that while the dual sovereignty doctrine is legally sound i...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
The Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause is an analytically gnarly beast. What seems like a fairly ...
Today, it is quite possible for a criminal defendant who has violated the laws of several countries ...
This Article offers a coherent way of thinking about double jeopardy rules among sovereigns. Its the...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and ...
In this case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, petitioner Gamble\u27s brief demonstrates that...
The dual-sovereignty doctrine is a significant carve-out to the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Cl...
This article analyzes the U. S. constitutional law interpreting the concept of “same offence.” Inclu...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
In Gamble v. United States, the defendant questioned the constitutionality of the dual sovereignty d...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...