The Model Business Corporation Act (hereinafter the Model Act ) has been in existence for more than twenty-five years, and has served as the paradigm for the revised corporation statutes of approximately twenty-five states, including Virginia. Despite its age, certain of its provisions have been infrequently applied and interpreted in judicial opinions. One such set of provisions is that dealing with a corporation\u27s right to redeem shares of its stock. The purpose of this article is to analyze the Model Act\u27s provisions regarding the redemption of shares; and to review, in contrast thereto, the relevant provisions of the Virginia stock corporation act
Legislation has attempted to balance fairly the interests of the dissenting shareholder against the ...
It was a well established rule at common law that fundamental changes in the character of a corporat...
Pursuant to section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an action was commenced by a share...
The Model Business Corporation Act (hereinafter the Model Act ) has been in existence for more than...
During its 1985 session, the Virginia General Assembly enacted a new stock corporation statute for V...
One consequence of the recent and far-reaching revisions to the financial provisions of the Model Bu...
In 2005, the Virginia Stock Corporation Act (the Virginia Act ) was extensively revised and updated...
ATTORNEYS, when advising clients regarding the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating a busin...
This article reviews recent developments in the law affecting Virginia businesses and corporations. ...
This Article discusses the requirements of section 302(b) for characterizing a stock redemption as a...
Until relatively recent times, the generally accepted rule was that a corporation could not merge, c...
Virginia\u27s recently enacted antitakeover statute, the Affiliated Transactions provision of the ...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Old Town Corporation, brought action on behalf of the corpo...
This Article reviews the redemption provisions of both section 302 and section 304 of the Internal R...
Plaintiffs owned 6 percent cumulative convertible prior preferred stock in defendant corporation. Th...
Legislation has attempted to balance fairly the interests of the dissenting shareholder against the ...
It was a well established rule at common law that fundamental changes in the character of a corporat...
Pursuant to section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an action was commenced by a share...
The Model Business Corporation Act (hereinafter the Model Act ) has been in existence for more than...
During its 1985 session, the Virginia General Assembly enacted a new stock corporation statute for V...
One consequence of the recent and far-reaching revisions to the financial provisions of the Model Bu...
In 2005, the Virginia Stock Corporation Act (the Virginia Act ) was extensively revised and updated...
ATTORNEYS, when advising clients regarding the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating a busin...
This article reviews recent developments in the law affecting Virginia businesses and corporations. ...
This Article discusses the requirements of section 302(b) for characterizing a stock redemption as a...
Until relatively recent times, the generally accepted rule was that a corporation could not merge, c...
Virginia\u27s recently enacted antitakeover statute, the Affiliated Transactions provision of the ...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Old Town Corporation, brought action on behalf of the corpo...
This Article reviews the redemption provisions of both section 302 and section 304 of the Internal R...
Plaintiffs owned 6 percent cumulative convertible prior preferred stock in defendant corporation. Th...
Legislation has attempted to balance fairly the interests of the dissenting shareholder against the ...
It was a well established rule at common law that fundamental changes in the character of a corporat...
Pursuant to section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an action was commenced by a share...