Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Old Town Corporation, brought action on behalf of the corporation to recover alleged shortswing profits made by defendants, who were officers, directors and large shareholders of Old Town, on the sale of 45.9 percent of the outstanding stock of the corporation. The corporation had, with the approval of 78 percent of the owners in interest, reclassified the 320,402 outstanding shares of $5 par common stock as 320,402 shares of $1 par common and 320,402 shares of 40¢ cumulative preferred stock of $7 par value. This reclassification was done for the frank purpose of increasing the market value and salability of defendants\u27 interest so that the defendants could sell their holdings. Within six months...
Plaintiffs (father and son) and defendants (two brothers) had owned all the capital stock of two cor...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
I. Introduction II. Rule 10b-5 and the Requirement of Adequate Disclosure—Protection for the Selling...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Old Town Corporation, brought action on behalf of the corpo...
Pursuant to section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an action was commenced by a share...
Parent corporation, owning a majority of the outstanding voting securities of its subsidiary, sold 1...
As it had done in the nine preceding years defendant corporation sought to win the loyalty of its ke...
Plaintiffs brought a shareholders\u27 class action under section 16 (b) of the Securities and Exchan...
In 1934, Congress enacted section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act in an effort to counteract th...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in X corporation, sued in the name of and on behalf of the corporation to r...
The Securities and Exchange Commission sued to enjoin defendant corporation from offering stock for ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a derivative action against the defendant officer for profits made in ...
Plaintiff corporation, after receiving authority from the Corporation Commissioner of California, ga...
Defendant, president of a corporation acquired stock owned by plaintiff and others by falsely repres...
Plaintiff holding company was incorporated with Murtland and two dummies as shareholders and officer...
Plaintiffs (father and son) and defendants (two brothers) had owned all the capital stock of two cor...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
I. Introduction II. Rule 10b-5 and the Requirement of Adequate Disclosure—Protection for the Selling...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder in the Old Town Corporation, brought action on behalf of the corpo...
Pursuant to section 16 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 an action was commenced by a share...
Parent corporation, owning a majority of the outstanding voting securities of its subsidiary, sold 1...
As it had done in the nine preceding years defendant corporation sought to win the loyalty of its ke...
Plaintiffs brought a shareholders\u27 class action under section 16 (b) of the Securities and Exchan...
In 1934, Congress enacted section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act in an effort to counteract th...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in X corporation, sued in the name of and on behalf of the corporation to r...
The Securities and Exchange Commission sued to enjoin defendant corporation from offering stock for ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a derivative action against the defendant officer for profits made in ...
Plaintiff corporation, after receiving authority from the Corporation Commissioner of California, ga...
Defendant, president of a corporation acquired stock owned by plaintiff and others by falsely repres...
Plaintiff holding company was incorporated with Murtland and two dummies as shareholders and officer...
Plaintiffs (father and son) and defendants (two brothers) had owned all the capital stock of two cor...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
I. Introduction II. Rule 10b-5 and the Requirement of Adequate Disclosure—Protection for the Selling...