Add to ORKGThis article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the apparent change recently introduced by the United States Supreme Court. After an examination of the ramifications of the new and old rules, certain changes in current practice are recommended which will better serve the interests of the deceased, his survivors, and society as a whole
In January 2008 and June 2008, the Standing Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Evidence authori...
The focus of this research is in the area of the United States death penalty. More specifically, it ...
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By const...
This article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the appa...
This article arrives at the surprising conclusion that a meaningful Eighth Amendment death penalty j...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This article examines the quantitative and qualitative requirements encompassed in the Supreme Court...
In the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, the United States Supreme Court invalidated virtually all exi...
Today, most jurisdictions bar a killer from succeeding to his victim\u27s property. The traditional ...
After Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail, two judges allowed his accusers to speak in court. ...
This Article provides a detailed exegesis and evaluation of the federal death penalty, including its...
In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Rees v. Peyton, a case that had been on its docket since 1...
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online...
Symposium: Toward A Model Death Penalty Code: The Massachusetts Governor\u27s Council Report
Although few dispute the appellate process\u27s centrality to justice systems, especially in the cri...
In January 2008 and June 2008, the Standing Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Evidence authori...
The focus of this research is in the area of the United States death penalty. More specifically, it ...
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By const...
This article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the appa...
This article arrives at the surprising conclusion that a meaningful Eighth Amendment death penalty j...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This article examines the quantitative and qualitative requirements encompassed in the Supreme Court...
In the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, the United States Supreme Court invalidated virtually all exi...
Today, most jurisdictions bar a killer from succeeding to his victim\u27s property. The traditional ...
After Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail, two judges allowed his accusers to speak in court. ...
This Article provides a detailed exegesis and evaluation of the federal death penalty, including its...
In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Rees v. Peyton, a case that had been on its docket since 1...
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online...
Symposium: Toward A Model Death Penalty Code: The Massachusetts Governor\u27s Council Report
Although few dispute the appellate process\u27s centrality to justice systems, especially in the cri...
In January 2008 and June 2008, the Standing Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Evidence authori...
The focus of this research is in the area of the United States death penalty. More specifically, it ...
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By const...