Add to ORKGThis article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the apparent change recently introduced by the United States Supreme Court. After an examination of the ramifications of the new and old rules, certain changes in current practice are recommended which will better serve the interests of the deceased, his survivors, and society as a whole
Last year was another busy year for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Whi...
After Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail, two judges allowed his accusers to speak in court. ...
Throughout the past few decades, the Supreme Court has steadily chipped away at the death penalty. I...
This article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the appa...
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By const...
The article discusses decisions of civil courts, which were addressed to deceased persons. These iss...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This Article surveys the death penalty decisions of the Georgia Supreme Court from June 1, 2002 thro...
The sweeping social changes presently occurring in this country are having important effects on the ...
Before 1991, South Carolina capital defendants benefitted from lenient policies of error preservatio...
The death of a loved one can be one of the most difficult times of a person\u27s life. This difficul...
Legal change is a fact of life, and the need to deal with it has spawned a number of complicated bod...
In an appeal from a federal district court verdict and judgment in a wrongful death action, appellee...
In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Rees v. Peyton, a case that had been on its docket since 1...
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure turn fifty in 2018. During the Rules’ half-century of exist...
Last year was another busy year for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Whi...
After Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail, two judges allowed his accusers to speak in court. ...
Throughout the past few decades, the Supreme Court has steadily chipped away at the death penalty. I...
This article discusses the way in which courts historically have disposed of such cases and the appa...
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By const...
The article discusses decisions of civil courts, which were addressed to deceased persons. These iss...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This Article surveys the death penalty decisions of the Georgia Supreme Court from June 1, 2002 thro...
The sweeping social changes presently occurring in this country are having important effects on the ...
Before 1991, South Carolina capital defendants benefitted from lenient policies of error preservatio...
The death of a loved one can be one of the most difficult times of a person\u27s life. This difficul...
Legal change is a fact of life, and the need to deal with it has spawned a number of complicated bod...
In an appeal from a federal district court verdict and judgment in a wrongful death action, appellee...
In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Rees v. Peyton, a case that had been on its docket since 1...
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure turn fifty in 2018. During the Rules’ half-century of exist...
Last year was another busy year for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Whi...
After Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail, two judges allowed his accusers to speak in court. ...
Throughout the past few decades, the Supreme Court has steadily chipped away at the death penalty. I...