This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examining the likely, impact of this statute on the constitutional rights of legally insane defendants. Part I will briefly outline the relevant provisions of the GBMI statute. Part II will consider whether legally insane defendants have a constitutional right to an insanity defense. Part III will then argue that some defendants, though legally insane at the time they committed allegedly criminal acts, will nevertheless be found GBMI rather than NGRI
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 119 S. Ct. 2176 (1999)...
The purpose of this comment is two-fold: first, to discuss generally the criminal law concept of men...
The great lengths to which the defense of insanity has been carried in homicide cases has induced nu...
This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examin...
This article will first explore the reasons for the controversy over the insanity defense to provide...
Because Michigan\u27s GBMI statute has been in effect for several years, enough data exists to asses...
This article, which is based on and expands on an amicus brief the authors submitted to the United S...
Legal insanity is an element of many legal systems, and it has often stirred debate. It appears that...
While other jurisdictions use guilty but mentally ill as a compromise verdict to fill the gap betwe...
This Article investigates jurisdictions’ compliance with M’Naghten’s directive for how to treat delu...
This article concentrates on one vital issue: to what extent are differences in treatment justified ...
The mental competence of a defendant charged with crime is assumed in most jurisdictions, and the de...
Petitioner was indicted for robbery from a United States Post Office. After a series of hearings and...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the last 15 years a flurry of legislative ac...
The jury\u27s verdict of acquittal by reason of insanity in the case of President Reagan\u27s attemp...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 119 S. Ct. 2176 (1999)...
The purpose of this comment is two-fold: first, to discuss generally the criminal law concept of men...
The great lengths to which the defense of insanity has been carried in homicide cases has induced nu...
This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examin...
This article will first explore the reasons for the controversy over the insanity defense to provide...
Because Michigan\u27s GBMI statute has been in effect for several years, enough data exists to asses...
This article, which is based on and expands on an amicus brief the authors submitted to the United S...
Legal insanity is an element of many legal systems, and it has often stirred debate. It appears that...
While other jurisdictions use guilty but mentally ill as a compromise verdict to fill the gap betwe...
This Article investigates jurisdictions’ compliance with M’Naghten’s directive for how to treat delu...
This article concentrates on one vital issue: to what extent are differences in treatment justified ...
The mental competence of a defendant charged with crime is assumed in most jurisdictions, and the de...
Petitioner was indicted for robbery from a United States Post Office. After a series of hearings and...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the last 15 years a flurry of legislative ac...
The jury\u27s verdict of acquittal by reason of insanity in the case of President Reagan\u27s attemp...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 119 S. Ct. 2176 (1999)...
The purpose of this comment is two-fold: first, to discuss generally the criminal law concept of men...
The great lengths to which the defense of insanity has been carried in homicide cases has induced nu...