This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examining the likely, impact of this statute on the constitutional rights of legally insane defendants. Part I will briefly outline the relevant provisions of the GBMI statute. Part II will consider whether legally insane defendants have a constitutional right to an insanity defense. Part III will then argue that some defendants, though legally insane at the time they committed allegedly criminal acts, will nevertheless be found GBMI rather than NGRI
article published in law reviewThis article argues that mental illness should no longer be the basis...
This paper provides a “first principles” analysis of the role and application of the insanity defenc...
An acquittal by reason of insanity is sufficiently adverse and is in many ways more akin to a convic...
This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examin...
This article will first explore the reasons for the controversy over the insanity defense to provide...
Because Michigan\u27s GBMI statute has been in effect for several years, enough data exists to asses...
Legal insanity is an element of many legal systems, and it has often stirred debate. It appears that...
This Article investigates jurisdictions’ compliance with M’Naghten’s directive for how to treat delu...
It is unlikely that any State at this moment in history would attempt to make it a criminal offense ...
This article, which is based on and expands on an amicus brief the authors submitted to the United S...
In 1995, Kansas, along with a small number of other states, passed a statute abrogating the widely r...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the last 15 years a flurry of legislative ac...
With the enactment of the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, sweeping changes were wrought in the ...
Defendant was convicted of first degree murder after having pleaded insanity as a defense to the cha...
of legal insanity to conform with recent recommendations of the American Bar Association and the Ame...
article published in law reviewThis article argues that mental illness should no longer be the basis...
This paper provides a “first principles” analysis of the role and application of the insanity defenc...
An acquittal by reason of insanity is sufficiently adverse and is in many ways more akin to a convic...
This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examin...
This article will first explore the reasons for the controversy over the insanity defense to provide...
Because Michigan\u27s GBMI statute has been in effect for several years, enough data exists to asses...
Legal insanity is an element of many legal systems, and it has often stirred debate. It appears that...
This Article investigates jurisdictions’ compliance with M’Naghten’s directive for how to treat delu...
It is unlikely that any State at this moment in history would attempt to make it a criminal offense ...
This article, which is based on and expands on an amicus brief the authors submitted to the United S...
In 1995, Kansas, along with a small number of other states, passed a statute abrogating the widely r...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the last 15 years a flurry of legislative ac...
With the enactment of the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, sweeping changes were wrought in the ...
Defendant was convicted of first degree murder after having pleaded insanity as a defense to the cha...
of legal insanity to conform with recent recommendations of the American Bar Association and the Ame...
article published in law reviewThis article argues that mental illness should no longer be the basis...
This paper provides a “first principles” analysis of the role and application of the insanity defenc...
An acquittal by reason of insanity is sufficiently adverse and is in many ways more akin to a convic...