Two approaches have emerged in recent American literature as to the appropriate United States attitude toward the World Court: (1) the re-acceptance of compulsory jurisdiction with various reservations to preserve vital American interests; and (2) the preservation of the status quo premised on a perception that the World Court is biased or misguided, while promoting the United States government\u27s perspective on international law. This article argues that neither approach comes to terms with the wide disagreements about content and process in the international community. Both fail to promote the goals of an enhanced World Court or a better international legal order. The Court\u27s compulsory jurisdiction cannot be saved by clever draftsma...
Recently some lawyers and statesmen have begun to cite judgments of the International Court of Justi...
Following the United States refusal to participate in the Nicaragua case,\u27 and its subsequent wit...
A fierce debate ensues among leading international law theorists that implicates the role of nationa...
Two approaches have emerged in recent American literature as to the appropriate United States attitu...
In recent years, the U.S. judiciary has taken steps to limit the role played by international law in...
In the last few years quite a few international lawyers have been complaining about the 1985 termina...
What did the United States Supreme Court mean when it famously said, International law is part of o...
The recently concluded Hague Convention on Choice of Courts Agreements is the culmination of over a ...
This Comment analyzes the administration\u27s cessation of its obligations under the ICJ\u27s compul...
This article addresses an issue with which federal courts have been forced to deal with increasing f...
This article argues that the field of “Federal Courts” scholarship ought to expand to consider the r...
In recent years, I have watched the swirling debate over whether the United States courts should con...
This article will describe how the World Court has abstained in a way that not only expresses its co...
Supporters of the idea that the rule of law should govern the world community have generally been di...
In recent years there has been a significant expansion of the number and kinds of cases in U.S. cour...
Recently some lawyers and statesmen have begun to cite judgments of the International Court of Justi...
Following the United States refusal to participate in the Nicaragua case,\u27 and its subsequent wit...
A fierce debate ensues among leading international law theorists that implicates the role of nationa...
Two approaches have emerged in recent American literature as to the appropriate United States attitu...
In recent years, the U.S. judiciary has taken steps to limit the role played by international law in...
In the last few years quite a few international lawyers have been complaining about the 1985 termina...
What did the United States Supreme Court mean when it famously said, International law is part of o...
The recently concluded Hague Convention on Choice of Courts Agreements is the culmination of over a ...
This Comment analyzes the administration\u27s cessation of its obligations under the ICJ\u27s compul...
This article addresses an issue with which federal courts have been forced to deal with increasing f...
This article argues that the field of “Federal Courts” scholarship ought to expand to consider the r...
In recent years, I have watched the swirling debate over whether the United States courts should con...
This article will describe how the World Court has abstained in a way that not only expresses its co...
Supporters of the idea that the rule of law should govern the world community have generally been di...
In recent years there has been a significant expansion of the number and kinds of cases in U.S. cour...
Recently some lawyers and statesmen have begun to cite judgments of the International Court of Justi...
Following the United States refusal to participate in the Nicaragua case,\u27 and its subsequent wit...
A fierce debate ensues among leading international law theorists that implicates the role of nationa...