Add to ORKGThree years ago, with the publication of his article \u27\u27An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem of Peremptories in this journal, Professor Friedman initiated a debate on the subject that was taken up in 1994 by three prosecutors who offered a rebuttal that was also printed in these pages. Professor Friedman continues the debate
This Article examines the peremptory challenge as modified by Batson and its progeny. The discussion...
Although proponents argue that peremptory challenges make juries more impartial by eliminating “extr...
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and wit...
Three years ago, with the publication of his article \u27\u27An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, and the extension of Batson to parties other ...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, and the extension of Batson to parties other ...
Three federal trial attorneys disagree with Professor Richard Friedman\u27s proposal to eliminate th...
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, prohibiting peremptory challenges on the basis of sexual orientatio...
In this Article, I review the efficacy of peremptory challenges and conclude that both empirical and...
Critics of peremptory-challenge systems commonly contend that they inevitably inflict “inequality ha...
A quarter of a century after the Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, overwhelming evidence demon...
Lawyers use peremptory challenges to create partial juries. United States Supreme Court precedent ha...
This article argues that religion-based peremptory challenges, while avoiding substantial administra...
It cannot be denied that our jury selection process has lent itself to invidious racial discriminati...
In March 2008, the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Louisiana, the latest in the line of progeny of B...
This Article examines the peremptory challenge as modified by Batson and its progeny. The discussion...
Although proponents argue that peremptory challenges make juries more impartial by eliminating “extr...
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and wit...
Three years ago, with the publication of his article \u27\u27An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, and the extension of Batson to parties other ...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, and the extension of Batson to parties other ...
Three federal trial attorneys disagree with Professor Richard Friedman\u27s proposal to eliminate th...
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, prohibiting peremptory challenges on the basis of sexual orientatio...
In this Article, I review the efficacy of peremptory challenges and conclude that both empirical and...
Critics of peremptory-challenge systems commonly contend that they inevitably inflict “inequality ha...
A quarter of a century after the Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, overwhelming evidence demon...
Lawyers use peremptory challenges to create partial juries. United States Supreme Court precedent ha...
This article argues that religion-based peremptory challenges, while avoiding substantial administra...
It cannot be denied that our jury selection process has lent itself to invidious racial discriminati...
In March 2008, the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Louisiana, the latest in the line of progeny of B...
This Article examines the peremptory challenge as modified by Batson and its progeny. The discussion...
Although proponents argue that peremptory challenges make juries more impartial by eliminating “extr...
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and wit...