In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate expenditures on political campaigns. The decision has been widely criticized and praised as a matter of First Amendment law. But it is also interesting as another step in the evolution of our legal views of the corporation. This Article argues that by viewing Citizens Unitedthrough the prism of theories about the corporate form, it is possible to see that the majority and the dissent departed from previous Supreme Court jurisprudence on the First Amendment rights of corporations. It is also possible to then predict what arguments can be expected next
In 2010, the Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, declared uncons...
This Note examines the concept of corporate personhood and whether the state-created corporate entit...
In a 5-4 opinion, decided January 21, 2010, Citizens United struck down § 203 of the Bipartisan Cam...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal ban on direct corporate expendit...
In this Article we show that Citizens United v. FEC, arguably the most important First Amendment cas...
No case in the Supreme Court’s last term was more controversial than Citizens United v. Federal Elec...
In 2010, the Supreme Court answered this question in Citizens United v. FEC, which granted corporati...
The Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) that the First Amen...
In this Article, we focus on a specific question raised by Citizens United, which is whether the Sup...
Although the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm...
Citizens United v. Election Commission held that, like human citizens, corporations can exercise the...
For two centuries now, jurists and corporate scholars have struggled with creating a singular, globa...
Why is a corporation a “person” for purposes of the Constitution? This old question has become new a...
Within hours of its announcement, the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC came under ...
In 2010, the Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, declared uncons...
This Note examines the concept of corporate personhood and whether the state-created corporate entit...
In a 5-4 opinion, decided January 21, 2010, Citizens United struck down § 203 of the Bipartisan Cam...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal ban on direct corporate expendit...
In this Article we show that Citizens United v. FEC, arguably the most important First Amendment cas...
No case in the Supreme Court’s last term was more controversial than Citizens United v. Federal Elec...
In 2010, the Supreme Court answered this question in Citizens United v. FEC, which granted corporati...
The Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) that the First Amen...
In this Article, we focus on a specific question raised by Citizens United, which is whether the Sup...
Although the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm...
Citizens United v. Election Commission held that, like human citizens, corporations can exercise the...
For two centuries now, jurists and corporate scholars have struggled with creating a singular, globa...
Why is a corporation a “person” for purposes of the Constitution? This old question has become new a...
Within hours of its announcement, the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC came under ...
In 2010, the Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, declared uncons...
This Note examines the concept of corporate personhood and whether the state-created corporate entit...
In a 5-4 opinion, decided January 21, 2010, Citizens United struck down § 203 of the Bipartisan Cam...