This article will analyze the decisions and arguments about judicial restraint emanating from the increasingly dominant Reagan appointees on the Supreme Court in order to question whether these justices are achieving their purported goal or are merely continuing activist judicial behavior in the service of conservative political values
This article addresses the issue of what is fit for a Supreme Court Justice to do and whether the Co...
This Article attempts, through statistical analysis, to identify the ideological leanings of the Uni...
A Review of Toward Increased Judicial Activism: The Political Role of the Supreme Court by Arthur S...
This Article, the twelfth in a series, attempts through statistical analysis to determine whether in...
This paper investigates whether Republicans or Democrats support a strong Supreme Court and why. Fur...
What may be the most significant achievement of the Reagan-Bush years is one we have only begun to a...
This Article offers a more sophisticated account of elite theory that incorporates the crucial insig...
The Article argues that the polarization in the appointments process for the United States Supreme C...
Popular discourse about the Supreme Court often seeks to characterize its direction in political ter...
Members of the dominant faction of the current Supreme Court are apparently trying to have their cak...
This Article examines the concept of a “minority Justice,” meaning a Supreme Court Justice appointed...
The power of judicial review of federal statutes in American constitutional history has the mystique...
Judicial voting behavior has been a primary focal point in American political analysis since the 194...
This article considers systematically whether the Supreme Court is more likely to review an en banc ...
To better understand stare decisis and to normatively explore our constitutional future, this articl...
This article addresses the issue of what is fit for a Supreme Court Justice to do and whether the Co...
This Article attempts, through statistical analysis, to identify the ideological leanings of the Uni...
A Review of Toward Increased Judicial Activism: The Political Role of the Supreme Court by Arthur S...
This Article, the twelfth in a series, attempts through statistical analysis to determine whether in...
This paper investigates whether Republicans or Democrats support a strong Supreme Court and why. Fur...
What may be the most significant achievement of the Reagan-Bush years is one we have only begun to a...
This Article offers a more sophisticated account of elite theory that incorporates the crucial insig...
The Article argues that the polarization in the appointments process for the United States Supreme C...
Popular discourse about the Supreme Court often seeks to characterize its direction in political ter...
Members of the dominant faction of the current Supreme Court are apparently trying to have their cak...
This Article examines the concept of a “minority Justice,” meaning a Supreme Court Justice appointed...
The power of judicial review of federal statutes in American constitutional history has the mystique...
Judicial voting behavior has been a primary focal point in American political analysis since the 194...
This article considers systematically whether the Supreme Court is more likely to review an en banc ...
To better understand stare decisis and to normatively explore our constitutional future, this articl...
This article addresses the issue of what is fit for a Supreme Court Justice to do and whether the Co...
This Article attempts, through statistical analysis, to identify the ideological leanings of the Uni...
A Review of Toward Increased Judicial Activism: The Political Role of the Supreme Court by Arthur S...