The Judicial Conference of the United States is charged by statute to carry on a continuous study of the operation and effect of the general rules of practice and procedure, recommending desirable changes to the Supreme Court.\u27 The Rules Enabling Act,2 which describes the Supreme Court\u27s role, further provides that the Judicial Conference is to be assisted in this task by a standing committee on rules of practice, procedure, and evidence ;3 the standing committee in turn reviews each recommendation of any other committees appointed to advise it.
These reflections seek to situate this most excellent Symposium in the rulemaking process. All contr...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In this Article, we argue that the Supreme Cour...
In our first article on the historical background of the proposed new rules of civil procedure for t...
The Judicial Conference of the United States is charged by statute to carry on a continuous study o...
In April 2000, the United States Supreme Court promulgated, and Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist t...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
Three decades have elapsed since Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure last underwent revi...
The rule-making power of the courts in the United States is is brought into focus wherever procedura...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
The Supreme Court plays two roles regarding the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. First, the Court p...
As we commemorate the diamond anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Article take...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
THE authority given to the IYnited States Supreme Court by the Actof June 19, 1934, to prescribe uni...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Unfortunately, any objective evaluation of current federal civil process will inevitably lead to the...
These reflections seek to situate this most excellent Symposium in the rulemaking process. All contr...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In this Article, we argue that the Supreme Cour...
In our first article on the historical background of the proposed new rules of civil procedure for t...
The Judicial Conference of the United States is charged by statute to carry on a continuous study o...
In April 2000, the United States Supreme Court promulgated, and Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist t...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
Three decades have elapsed since Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure last underwent revi...
The rule-making power of the courts in the United States is is brought into focus wherever procedura...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
The Supreme Court plays two roles regarding the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. First, the Court p...
As we commemorate the diamond anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Article take...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
THE authority given to the IYnited States Supreme Court by the Actof June 19, 1934, to prescribe uni...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Unfortunately, any objective evaluation of current federal civil process will inevitably lead to the...
These reflections seek to situate this most excellent Symposium in the rulemaking process. All contr...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In this Article, we argue that the Supreme Cour...
In our first article on the historical background of the proposed new rules of civil procedure for t...
Add to ORKG