Add to ORKGAfter the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), and Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 (1964), which revealed the Supreme Court\u27s solicitude of the constitutional rights of adults, it seemed improbable that the lower courts would long be permitted to continue ignoring the constitutional rights of juveniles. Thus the decision in the principal case, which represents a breakthrough in the assurance of a fair hearing to minors, comes as no surprise. The case holds that under the Fourteenth Amendment a juvenile has a right to notice of the charges against him, to counsel, to confrontation of his accusers, to cross-examination, and to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
An attorney once commented that the effect of Gault was to place him in his proper role, that of an ...
It is the writer\u27s intention to compare Ohio\u27s new juvenile code with that offered by the Crim...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
When fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault of Globe, Arizona, allegedly made an obscene phone call to a neig...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
Our discussion is presented in seven parts. In Part I, we briefly sketch historical conceptions of a...
Review of the 1969 decisions in juvenile law reveals that the courts in California, as elsewhere, ha...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding ...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
This Comment considers the juvenile justice system and the application of the Fifth Amendment’s priv...
A determination was made of the degree to which the four requirements of Gault were met in District ...
A Review of Juveniles\u27 Waiver of Rights: Legal and Psychological Competence by Thomas Griss
Genevieve Fay Brumley was adjudged a delinquent child by the juvenile court of Snohomish County on D...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
An attorney once commented that the effect of Gault was to place him in his proper role, that of an ...
It is the writer\u27s intention to compare Ohio\u27s new juvenile code with that offered by the Crim...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
When fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault of Globe, Arizona, allegedly made an obscene phone call to a neig...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
Our discussion is presented in seven parts. In Part I, we briefly sketch historical conceptions of a...
Review of the 1969 decisions in juvenile law reveals that the courts in California, as elsewhere, ha...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding ...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
This Comment considers the juvenile justice system and the application of the Fifth Amendment’s priv...
A determination was made of the degree to which the four requirements of Gault were met in District ...
A Review of Juveniles\u27 Waiver of Rights: Legal and Psychological Competence by Thomas Griss
Genevieve Fay Brumley was adjudged a delinquent child by the juvenile court of Snohomish County on D...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
An attorney once commented that the effect of Gault was to place him in his proper role, that of an ...
It is the writer\u27s intention to compare Ohio\u27s new juvenile code with that offered by the Crim...