Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding is not so fundamental as to be constitutionally required. Terry Appeal, 438 Pa. 339, 265 A.2d 350 (1970)
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
The juvenile justice system has become increasingly punitive in recent decades. While the juvenile j...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
The New York Court of Appeals has overruled the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, which he...
At a hearing in the juvenile court of Philadelphia in October 1968, Joseph McKeiver was declared a ...
After the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
This Comment addresses the issue of a juvenile\u27s right to trial by jury. The author traces the or...
Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has indicated that a distinction exists as to the admissibility of h...
Despite the differences between the criminal and juvenile court systems, the Supreme Court has exte...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
Genevieve Fay Brumley was adjudged a delinquent child by the juvenile court of Snohomish County on D...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
The juvenile justice system has become increasingly punitive in recent decades. While the juvenile j...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
The New York Court of Appeals has overruled the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, which he...
At a hearing in the juvenile court of Philadelphia in October 1968, Joseph McKeiver was declared a ...
After the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
This Comment addresses the issue of a juvenile\u27s right to trial by jury. The author traces the or...
Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has indicated that a distinction exists as to the admissibility of h...
Despite the differences between the criminal and juvenile court systems, the Supreme Court has exte...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
Genevieve Fay Brumley was adjudged a delinquent child by the juvenile court of Snohomish County on D...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
The juvenile justice system has become increasingly punitive in recent decades. While the juvenile j...