Add to ORKGAfter twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to 13.75 cfs from Ten Mile Creek, the city’s primary water source. The Court found a statute allowing cities and municipalities to exercise water rights that have gone through extended periods of nonuse did not need a retroactive clause
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In the arid Inland Northwest, water is undoubtedly the most important natural resource. Western Mont...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In the arid Inland Northwest, water is undoubtedly the most important natural resource. Western Mont...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In the arid Inland Northwest, water is undoubtedly the most important natural resource. Western Mont...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...