Add to ORKGAfter twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to 13.75 cfs from Ten Mile Creek, the city’s primary water source. The Court found a statute allowing cities and municipalities to exercise water rights that have gone through extended periods of nonuse did not need a retroactive clause
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...