Add to ORKGSeminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida stands as a declaration that tribal sovereignty preempts state taxation of tribal lands. Although the court framed its decision in the “‘deeply rooted’ historical ‘policy of leaving Indians free from state jurisdiction and control,” it held that Florida’s Rental and Utility Taxes imposed upon the Tribe were impermissible, based not on the rights and sovereignty of tribes, but on well-established principals of judicial deference to agency rule making
In Miccosukee I, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wanted to build a bridge along the Tamiani Trail t...
In Florida there are four reservations for Indians— three established by the federal government and ...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida stands as a declaration that tribal sovereignty preemp...
Long before the Florida Seminoles received federal recognition as a tribe in 1957 under the Indian R...
Although once the owners of the North American continent, native peoples and the governments that re...
Federal Legislation: Florida Indian (Seminole) Land Claims Settlement Act of 1987, 25 USC 19, Sec. 1...
The typical remedy for a property owner whose property interests have been diminished from governmen...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
Over the years, the policy of the federal government toward American Indians has vacillated between ...
Seminole Tribe v. Florida is the 1995 Term\u27s illustration of the importance that a narrow, but so...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, decided June 14, 1976, provided clarity on the jurisdict...
The United States Supreme Court held that congressional powers pursuant to Article I of the United S...
In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution\u27s Article III embodies...
In Miccosukee I, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wanted to build a bridge along the Tamiani Trail t...
In Florida there are four reservations for Indians— three established by the federal government and ...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida stands as a declaration that tribal sovereignty preemp...
Long before the Florida Seminoles received federal recognition as a tribe in 1957 under the Indian R...
Although once the owners of the North American continent, native peoples and the governments that re...
Federal Legislation: Florida Indian (Seminole) Land Claims Settlement Act of 1987, 25 USC 19, Sec. 1...
The typical remedy for a property owner whose property interests have been diminished from governmen...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
Over the years, the policy of the federal government toward American Indians has vacillated between ...
Seminole Tribe v. Florida is the 1995 Term\u27s illustration of the importance that a narrow, but so...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, decided June 14, 1976, provided clarity on the jurisdict...
The United States Supreme Court held that congressional powers pursuant to Article I of the United S...
In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution\u27s Article III embodies...
In Miccosukee I, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wanted to build a bridge along the Tamiani Trail t...
In Florida there are four reservations for Indians— three established by the federal government and ...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...