Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court held that congressional powers pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution cannot be relied upon to evade constitutional limitations placed upon federal jurisdiction by the Eleventh Amendment as the Amendment restricts judicial power under Article III. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 116 S. Ct. 1114 (1996
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
This article argues that conflicting analytical strains run through the Supreme Court\u27s recent ma...
In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution\u27s Article III embodies...
Seminole Tribe v. Florida is the 1995 Term\u27s illustration of the importance that a narrow, but so...
Part I of this Article briefly traces the history of the Supreme Court\u27s Eleventh Amendment juris...
What are the constitutional parameters of state sovereign immunity? The Court has made clear that ce...
This article will explore recent court decisions discussion the issue of sovereign state immunity fr...
Sovereign immunity jurisprudence has always been a confusing jumble of assumptions which seem incomp...
The Supreme Court\u27s Eleventh Amendment decisions give conflicting signals about what the Amendmen...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent invigoration of federalism doctrine has revived a question that had lo...
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) permits Indian tribes to operate casino games on Indian land...
When the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not rely upon its powers under Article I to abrogat...
Since 1997, the Court has issued almost a dozen Eleventh Amendment decisions, each of which expanded...
The doctrine of state sovereign immunity in the courts of another state and the federal courts will...
Twenty years have passed since the Supreme Court announced dramatic changes to the doctrine of state...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
This article argues that conflicting analytical strains run through the Supreme Court\u27s recent ma...
In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution\u27s Article III embodies...
Seminole Tribe v. Florida is the 1995 Term\u27s illustration of the importance that a narrow, but so...
Part I of this Article briefly traces the history of the Supreme Court\u27s Eleventh Amendment juris...
What are the constitutional parameters of state sovereign immunity? The Court has made clear that ce...
This article will explore recent court decisions discussion the issue of sovereign state immunity fr...
Sovereign immunity jurisprudence has always been a confusing jumble of assumptions which seem incomp...
The Supreme Court\u27s Eleventh Amendment decisions give conflicting signals about what the Amendmen...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent invigoration of federalism doctrine has revived a question that had lo...
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) permits Indian tribes to operate casino games on Indian land...
When the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not rely upon its powers under Article I to abrogat...
Since 1997, the Court has issued almost a dozen Eleventh Amendment decisions, each of which expanded...
The doctrine of state sovereign immunity in the courts of another state and the federal courts will...
Twenty years have passed since the Supreme Court announced dramatic changes to the doctrine of state...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
This article argues that conflicting analytical strains run through the Supreme Court\u27s recent ma...
In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution\u27s Article III embodies...