Add to ORKGThis is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson\u27s discussion of the Convention Relative to the Opening of Hostilities, signed at The Hague in 1907 (the Third Hague Convention ), and its impact upon the 1948 Tokyo war crimes trial. Judge Robinson was United States counsel and naval legal officer in charge of the Pearl Harbor phase and other parts of the Tokyo trial. The first portion of his article appeared in the September issue of the Journal, beginning at page 973
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Governor of Hawaii suspended the writ of habeas corpus...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
This is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson\u27s discussion of the Convention Relative to the O...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
"In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies, the world turned to the question of how...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
After the war in the Pacific formally ended in September 1945, the victorious Allies occupied Japan ...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
The US Army war crimes trials held in Manila from 1945 to 1947 prosecuted around 200 Japanese milita...
This article is a sequel to "The Mystifying Blank in the Narrative of the 1940s: The Australian View...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Governor of Hawaii suspended the writ of habeas corpus...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
This is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson\u27s discussion of the Convention Relative to the O...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
"In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies, the world turned to the question of how...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
After the war in the Pacific formally ended in September 1945, the victorious Allies occupied Japan ...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
The US Army war crimes trials held in Manila from 1945 to 1947 prosecuted around 200 Japanese milita...
This article is a sequel to "The Mystifying Blank in the Narrative of the 1940s: The Australian View...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Governor of Hawaii suspended the writ of habeas corpus...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...