Add to ORKGIn this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and historical background of that trial which took place in Japan following World War II. Judge Robinson centers his discussion around the little-known provisions of the Convention Relative to the Opening of Hostilities, which was signed at The Hague in 1907. One of the primary purposes of that convention was to outlaw surprise attack such as that committed by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor. The first part of Judge Robinson\u27s article appears in this issue; the second and concluding portion will be published next month
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justi...
On August 6 and 9 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima a...
This is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson\u27s discussion of the Convention Relative to the O...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
"In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies, the world turned to the question of how...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Governor of Hawaii suspended the writ of habeas corpus...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justi...
On August 6 and 9 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima a...
This is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson\u27s discussion of the Convention Relative to the O...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
"In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies, the world turned to the question of how...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
On the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Governor of Hawaii suspended the writ of habeas corpus...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justi...
On August 6 and 9 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima a...