Executive branch agencies typically use a process of notice-and-comment to permit the public to respond to the proposed text of rules. The legal literature has not considered whether a similar process would be helpful for the judicial branch. In this Article, Professors Abramowicz and Colby argue that it would be. Neither the parties to a litigation nor third parties generally have an opportunity to comment on judicial opinions after they are drafted but before they are made final. As a result, judicial opinions often contain errors and frequently have far-ranging and unanticipated negative consequences. A notice-and-comment system could mitigate these concerns, and could also help to constrain judges to follow the rule of law and to impr...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
This Article evaluates different rhetorical strategies Supreme Court justices employ in writing thei...
In this essay, I discuss the meaning of ten empirical studies of judicial review of agency actions t...
Executive branch agencies typically use a process of notice-and-comment to permit the public to re...
In 2012, the Government Accountability Office surprised many administrative law specialists by repor...
The cornerstone of informal rulemaking is the notice and comment procedure. Through this simple, and...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
Agencies, courts, and academics agree that notice-and-comment rulemaking is not a referendum. But th...
Courts have long struggled to distinguish legislative rules, which are designed to have binding lega...
This article continues the exploration of what I have termed judicial inactivism - the possibility...
Controversies involving the United States Supreme Court generally center on the content of Court’s d...
The author describes the common law as a machine, with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He...
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions ar...
The basis for these comments is a decision last year by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anast...
The judicial branch was created in order to ensure that the rule of law and not the rule of man prev...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
This Article evaluates different rhetorical strategies Supreme Court justices employ in writing thei...
In this essay, I discuss the meaning of ten empirical studies of judicial review of agency actions t...
Executive branch agencies typically use a process of notice-and-comment to permit the public to re...
In 2012, the Government Accountability Office surprised many administrative law specialists by repor...
The cornerstone of informal rulemaking is the notice and comment procedure. Through this simple, and...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
Agencies, courts, and academics agree that notice-and-comment rulemaking is not a referendum. But th...
Courts have long struggled to distinguish legislative rules, which are designed to have binding lega...
This article continues the exploration of what I have termed judicial inactivism - the possibility...
Controversies involving the United States Supreme Court generally center on the content of Court’s d...
The author describes the common law as a machine, with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He...
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions ar...
The basis for these comments is a decision last year by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anast...
The judicial branch was created in order to ensure that the rule of law and not the rule of man prev...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
This Article evaluates different rhetorical strategies Supreme Court justices employ in writing thei...
In this essay, I discuss the meaning of ten empirical studies of judicial review of agency actions t...