The current work for hire doctrine, as embodied by 17 U.S.C. Sections 101 and 201 and interpreted by the judiciary, provides a default rule of copyright ownership in favor of employers where a work is created by an employee in the scope of employment. In the absence of a written agreement, a finding that an engagement is a work for hire under the statute automatically results in all ownership being vested in the employer. This result often contradicts business norms and the understanding of one or both of the parties. In this Article, I advocate abolishing the all-or-nothing concept of ownership in favor of a more particularized analysis that emphasizes the expectations of the parties. This would involve first reversing the current, pro-emp...
The Copyright Law of the United States (CLUS) protects the creation of all literary and artistic wor...
Many recording artists and songwriters never reap the rewards of their work. America\u27s first prof...
Corporations have long held core aspects of legal personhood, such as rights to own and divest prope...
The current work for hire doctrine, as embodied by 17 U.S.C. Sections 101 and 201 and interpreted by...
Often, a copyrighted work is not created by one or even two authors but, instead, by a multitude of ...
Authorship, and hence, initial ownership of copyrighted works is oftentimes controlled by the 1976 C...
Many copyrightable works of university faculty members may be works-for-hire as defined under curren...
The author examines the works made for hire doctrine and the confusion that has arisen in the fede...
The Copyright Act of 1976 provides that works—including scholarship—written within the scope of empl...
Prior to the Supreme Court\u27s 1989 decision in Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, the C...
The work for hire doctrine is a legal mechanism by which the creator of an artistic work’s employer ...
U.S. copyright law mandates the employer is both the author and owner of any work created by an empl...
It has been more than 15 years since the U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark decision in Community f...
Authorship of copyrighted works is oftentimes controlled by the 1976 Copyright Act’s work made for h...
This Essay focuses on the interrelation of three legal doctrines that affect the allocation of owner...
The Copyright Law of the United States (CLUS) protects the creation of all literary and artistic wor...
Many recording artists and songwriters never reap the rewards of their work. America\u27s first prof...
Corporations have long held core aspects of legal personhood, such as rights to own and divest prope...
The current work for hire doctrine, as embodied by 17 U.S.C. Sections 101 and 201 and interpreted by...
Often, a copyrighted work is not created by one or even two authors but, instead, by a multitude of ...
Authorship, and hence, initial ownership of copyrighted works is oftentimes controlled by the 1976 C...
Many copyrightable works of university faculty members may be works-for-hire as defined under curren...
The author examines the works made for hire doctrine and the confusion that has arisen in the fede...
The Copyright Act of 1976 provides that works—including scholarship—written within the scope of empl...
Prior to the Supreme Court\u27s 1989 decision in Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, the C...
The work for hire doctrine is a legal mechanism by which the creator of an artistic work’s employer ...
U.S. copyright law mandates the employer is both the author and owner of any work created by an empl...
It has been more than 15 years since the U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark decision in Community f...
Authorship of copyrighted works is oftentimes controlled by the 1976 Copyright Act’s work made for h...
This Essay focuses on the interrelation of three legal doctrines that affect the allocation of owner...
The Copyright Law of the United States (CLUS) protects the creation of all literary and artistic wor...
Many recording artists and songwriters never reap the rewards of their work. America\u27s first prof...
Corporations have long held core aspects of legal personhood, such as rights to own and divest prope...