This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. After setting forth the Court’s general approach to democracy, I develop a new conceptual framework for the Court’s approach to democratic rights. First, I argue that the Court has adopted a “bundle of democratic rights” approach to the right to vote. By this I mean that the Court has interpreted the right to vote as consisting of multiple democratic rights, each of which is concerned with a particular facet of democratic governance. Second, I claim that the democratic rights recognized by the Court are best understood as structural rights. Structural rights theory offers a new way to account for the individual and institutional dimensions of dem...
The advent of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms signaled a new and vastly expanded role for the ju...
This article considers the process by which electoral reform ought to take place, focusing in partic...
There is very little consensus on the Supreme Court when the topic before the justices concerns the ...
This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. Afte...
This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. Afte...
Paper Presented at the University of Toronto Political Science Undergraduate Research Conference 201...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s political process cases cover a wide array of issues, including the ri...
Paper Presented at the University of Toronto Political Science Undergraduate Research Conference 201...
This article argues for a judicial interpretation of the right to vote under s.3 of the Canadian Cha...
The purpose of this essay is to gain a greater understanding of judicial reasoning and strategic jud...
The purpose of this essay is to gain a greater understanding of judicial reasoning and strategic jud...
The author argues that, under section 1 of the Charter, the courts must weigh carefully the democrat...
In this article I seek to develop a theoretical framework through which to view the law of democracy...
This article argues for a judicial interpretation of the right to vote under s.3 of the Canadian Cha...
The advent of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms signaled a new and vastly expanded role for the ju...
The advent of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms signaled a new and vastly expanded role for the ju...
This article considers the process by which electoral reform ought to take place, focusing in partic...
There is very little consensus on the Supreme Court when the topic before the justices concerns the ...
This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. Afte...
This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. Afte...
Paper Presented at the University of Toronto Political Science Undergraduate Research Conference 201...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s political process cases cover a wide array of issues, including the ri...
Paper Presented at the University of Toronto Political Science Undergraduate Research Conference 201...
This article argues for a judicial interpretation of the right to vote under s.3 of the Canadian Cha...
The purpose of this essay is to gain a greater understanding of judicial reasoning and strategic jud...
The purpose of this essay is to gain a greater understanding of judicial reasoning and strategic jud...
The author argues that, under section 1 of the Charter, the courts must weigh carefully the democrat...
In this article I seek to develop a theoretical framework through which to view the law of democracy...
This article argues for a judicial interpretation of the right to vote under s.3 of the Canadian Cha...
The advent of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms signaled a new and vastly expanded role for the ju...
The advent of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms signaled a new and vastly expanded role for the ju...
This article considers the process by which electoral reform ought to take place, focusing in partic...
There is very little consensus on the Supreme Court when the topic before the justices concerns the ...