Add to ORKGLater this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises to be one of the new term\u27s most important nuts-and-bolts cases for litigators. General Electric Co. v. Joiner, no. 96-188, is expected to determine the standard of review that federal appellate courts must give to lower court decisions on the admissibility of scientific evidence. The Court\u27s decision in Joiner promises to have an important effect on a broad range of cases in which causation often is a pivotal issue
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
The nations courts of appeals have struggled to devise coherent approach to harmonizing existing cir...
Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises ...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
This article considers the role of the trial court in responding to the changes wrought by scientifi...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
The nations courts of appeals have struggled to devise coherent approach to harmonizing existing cir...
Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises ...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
This article considers the role of the trial court in responding to the changes wrought by scientifi...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
The nations courts of appeals have struggled to devise coherent approach to harmonizing existing cir...