Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises to be one of the new term\u27s most important nuts-and-bolts cases for litigators. General Electric Co. v. Joiner, no. 96-188, is expected to determine the standard of review that federal appellate courts must give to lower court decisions on the admissibility of scientific evidence. The Court\u27s decision in Joiner promises to have an important effect on a broad range of cases in which causation often is a pivotal issue
With its decision in Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court, th...
The North Carolina Supreme Court made significant progress toward resolving the uncertainty in the l...
Dismissal of a federal complaint, for failure to state a claim, could only be allowed if it appears...
Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises ...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
This Article explores one aspect of this development-the evidentiary standards employed by courts to...
The survey period saw a number of cases raising significant evidentiary issues. For example, lawyers...
In State v. Dorsey the New Mexico Supreme Court held that the results of polygraph examinations are ...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
There has been a historical availability of new trials based on newly discovered evidence in the Uni...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued opinions in two significant Georgia voter redistricting cases...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
With its decision in Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court, th...
The North Carolina Supreme Court made significant progress toward resolving the uncertainty in the l...
Dismissal of a federal complaint, for failure to state a claim, could only be allowed if it appears...
Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up an evidence dispute from Georgia that promises ...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
This Article explores one aspect of this development-the evidentiary standards employed by courts to...
The survey period saw a number of cases raising significant evidentiary issues. For example, lawyers...
In State v. Dorsey the New Mexico Supreme Court held that the results of polygraph examinations are ...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
There has been a historical availability of new trials based on newly discovered evidence in the Uni...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued opinions in two significant Georgia voter redistricting cases...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
With its decision in Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court, th...
The North Carolina Supreme Court made significant progress toward resolving the uncertainty in the l...
Dismissal of a federal complaint, for failure to state a claim, could only be allowed if it appears...