Beer Inst. v. Healy, 849 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1988) (amended beer price affirmation provisions of Connecticut Liquor Control Act violated the commerce clause and did not represent a valid exercise of state\u27s power under the Twenty-first Amendment), aff\u27d, 491 U.S. 324 (1989)
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmondhttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-cour...
This Article examines the potential legal implications under New York consumer protection laws of th...
52-1JudiciaryExclusion of Intoxicants from Indian Territory. [3048] Amends law so that beer and othe...
Beer Inst. v. Healy, 849 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1988) (amended beer price affirmation provisions of Conne...
In January 2013, New York joined a recent legislative trend and adopted into law a farm brewery lice...
The Eighteenth Amendment, which prohibited alcohol distribution and sales nationwide, signaled a shi...
Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter, 16 N.Y. 47, 209 N.E.2d 701, 262 N.Y.S.2d 75, cert. gr...
Part I of this Note examines the current state of the law in the liquor affirmation area. Part II ar...
At first blush, Connecticut’s liquor laws serve the noble purpose of protecting the state’s small bu...
The defendant sold at his sandwich stand what was agreed to be a malt beverage commonly known as 3.2...
The Supreme Court erred by denying certiorari in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage C...
Resolution in support of the Hub Pizzeria\u27s attempts to obtain a license to sell beer
On being refused a license, a carrier operating under the provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Ac...
The United States has a drinking problem; or rather, an alcohol problem. In the aftermath of Prohibi...
This Recent Development examines the tension between the first and twenty-first amendments when a st...
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmondhttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-cour...
This Article examines the potential legal implications under New York consumer protection laws of th...
52-1JudiciaryExclusion of Intoxicants from Indian Territory. [3048] Amends law so that beer and othe...
Beer Inst. v. Healy, 849 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1988) (amended beer price affirmation provisions of Conne...
In January 2013, New York joined a recent legislative trend and adopted into law a farm brewery lice...
The Eighteenth Amendment, which prohibited alcohol distribution and sales nationwide, signaled a shi...
Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter, 16 N.Y. 47, 209 N.E.2d 701, 262 N.Y.S.2d 75, cert. gr...
Part I of this Note examines the current state of the law in the liquor affirmation area. Part II ar...
At first blush, Connecticut’s liquor laws serve the noble purpose of protecting the state’s small bu...
The defendant sold at his sandwich stand what was agreed to be a malt beverage commonly known as 3.2...
The Supreme Court erred by denying certiorari in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage C...
Resolution in support of the Hub Pizzeria\u27s attempts to obtain a license to sell beer
On being refused a license, a carrier operating under the provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Ac...
The United States has a drinking problem; or rather, an alcohol problem. In the aftermath of Prohibi...
This Recent Development examines the tension between the first and twenty-first amendments when a st...
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmondhttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-cour...
This Article examines the potential legal implications under New York consumer protection laws of th...
52-1JudiciaryExclusion of Intoxicants from Indian Territory. [3048] Amends law so that beer and othe...