Add to ORKGIn a recent issue of this Journal, Carr and Mathewson (1988) test a model of the impact of limited and unlimited liability regimes on the nature of firms by comparing the performance of law firms operated as partnerships and sole proprietorships (and therefore subject to unlimited liability) with that of law firms operated as corporations (and therefore subject to limited liability)
In this Article we discuss how U.S. entity law has evolved in recent decades so that (i) limited lia...
Limited liability is a fundamental principle of corporate law. Yet liability has never been absolute...
Misconduct by lawyers in law firms is often attributed to pressures from increasing competition for ...
In a recent issue of this Journal, Carr and Mathewson (1988) test a model of the impact of limited a...
Since the rapid rise in organizational forms for business associations, academics and practitioners ...
Professional service providers who wish to organize as multi-person firms have historically been lim...
This Article suggests that the partnership form is attractive for many firms on the margin only beca...
This article addresses the overlooked negative consequences of law firms transitioning from a tradit...
The thesis here is that the historical explanation for the way things are, accurate as it may be, ha...
Although many states have embraced the concept of limited liability for attorneys, approval is not u...
This article addresses the overlooked negative consequences of law firms transitioning from a tradit...
This paper argues a controlling owner's limited liability can help a regulator correct the externali...
This Article explores the implications of the emergence of the limited liability company for our und...
In a recent article we criticized the traditional case for limiting shareholder liability for corpor...
The limited liability company is one of the newest forms of business organization. This form combine...
In this Article we discuss how U.S. entity law has evolved in recent decades so that (i) limited lia...
Limited liability is a fundamental principle of corporate law. Yet liability has never been absolute...
Misconduct by lawyers in law firms is often attributed to pressures from increasing competition for ...
In a recent issue of this Journal, Carr and Mathewson (1988) test a model of the impact of limited a...
Since the rapid rise in organizational forms for business associations, academics and practitioners ...
Professional service providers who wish to organize as multi-person firms have historically been lim...
This Article suggests that the partnership form is attractive for many firms on the margin only beca...
This article addresses the overlooked negative consequences of law firms transitioning from a tradit...
The thesis here is that the historical explanation for the way things are, accurate as it may be, ha...
Although many states have embraced the concept of limited liability for attorneys, approval is not u...
This article addresses the overlooked negative consequences of law firms transitioning from a tradit...
This paper argues a controlling owner's limited liability can help a regulator correct the externali...
This Article explores the implications of the emergence of the limited liability company for our und...
In a recent article we criticized the traditional case for limiting shareholder liability for corpor...
The limited liability company is one of the newest forms of business organization. This form combine...
In this Article we discuss how U.S. entity law has evolved in recent decades so that (i) limited lia...
Limited liability is a fundamental principle of corporate law. Yet liability has never been absolute...
Misconduct by lawyers in law firms is often attributed to pressures from increasing competition for ...