Add to ORKGJohn Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial review, breaking away from both interpretivism and noninterpretivism – a division Professor Ely regards as a false dichotomy (p. vii). The book is brilliant and provocative, so much so that one fears less that its faults will be obscured – there is little danger that polemic critics will fail to pounce on them – than that the flash of Professor Ely\u27s reasoning and the controversy it generates will distract us from the genuine importance of the insight that powers his analysis
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Two hundred years after its most famous invocation in Marbury v. Madison, judicial review has appare...
In this essay Professor Deutsch examines the legitimacy of judicial review, in part as a response to...
John Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial...
Democracy and Distrust, an often funny book on a serious subject by a careful, witty and inventive s...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Reviewing Democracy and Distrust. By John Hart Ely. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980
In this book i shall elaborate a third theory of juicidal review, one that i shall argue is consiste...
Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial ReviewBy John Hart ElyCambridge, Mass. : Harvard Unive...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
This response to Professor Dan Kahan’s recent Harvard Foreword, Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognit...
Scholarship in philosophy proceeds at a slower pace than in the law. As Tom Lehrer, the poet laureat...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Many democratic and jurisprudential theorists have too often uncritically accepted Alexander Bickel’...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Two hundred years after its most famous invocation in Marbury v. Madison, judicial review has appare...
In this essay Professor Deutsch examines the legitimacy of judicial review, in part as a response to...
John Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial...
Democracy and Distrust, an often funny book on a serious subject by a careful, witty and inventive s...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Reviewing Democracy and Distrust. By John Hart Ely. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980
In this book i shall elaborate a third theory of juicidal review, one that i shall argue is consiste...
Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial ReviewBy John Hart ElyCambridge, Mass. : Harvard Unive...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
This response to Professor Dan Kahan’s recent Harvard Foreword, Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognit...
Scholarship in philosophy proceeds at a slower pace than in the law. As Tom Lehrer, the poet laureat...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Many democratic and jurisprudential theorists have too often uncritically accepted Alexander Bickel’...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Two hundred years after its most famous invocation in Marbury v. Madison, judicial review has appare...
In this essay Professor Deutsch examines the legitimacy of judicial review, in part as a response to...