Add to ORKGJohn Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial review, breaking away from both interpretivism and noninterpretivism – a division Professor Ely regards as a false dichotomy (p. vii). The book is brilliant and provocative, so much so that one fears less that its faults will be obscured – there is little danger that polemic critics will fail to pounce on them – than that the flash of Professor Ely\u27s reasoning and the controversy it generates will distract us from the genuine importance of the insight that powers his analysis
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately ill-chosen, comparison between m...
article published in law reviewThis response to Professor Dan Kahan’s recent Harvard Foreword, Neutr...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately illchosen, comparison between my...
John Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial...
In this book i shall elaborate a third theory of juicidal review, one that i shall argue is consiste...
Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial ReviewBy John Hart ElyCambridge, Mass. : Harvard Unive...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Democracy and Distrust, an often funny book on a serious subject by a careful, witty and inventive s...
Reviewing Democracy and Distrust. By John Hart Ely. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification even though judges may be no ...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
Scholarship in philosophy proceeds at a slower pace than in the law. As Tom Lehrer, the poet laureat...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately ill-chosen, comparison between m...
article published in law reviewThis response to Professor Dan Kahan’s recent Harvard Foreword, Neutr...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately illchosen, comparison between my...
John Hart Ely\u27s Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial...
In this book i shall elaborate a third theory of juicidal review, one that i shall argue is consiste...
Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial ReviewBy John Hart ElyCambridge, Mass. : Harvard Unive...
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
Democracy and Distrust, an often funny book on a serious subject by a careful, witty and inventive s...
Reviewing Democracy and Distrust. By John Hart Ely. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980
A Review of Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review by John Hart El
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification even though judges may be no ...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
Scholarship in philosophy proceeds at a slower pace than in the law. As Tom Lehrer, the poet laureat...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately ill-chosen, comparison between m...
article published in law reviewThis response to Professor Dan Kahan’s recent Harvard Foreword, Neutr...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately illchosen, comparison between my...