The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from the merits. In this Article, Professor Lee challenges both those notions. Jurisdiction is more akin to legitimate authority than to power, and, as such, cannot be conceptually distinguished from the merits, which also ultimately pertain to legitimate authority. Professor Lee argues that courts should therefore abstain from the metaphysics of jurisdiction-they should always ask whether, all things considered, they should rule as a plaintiff asks, not whether they are capable of so ruling
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
There is no doubt that in the days of procedural refinements, arbitrary distinctions and uncertainty...
This book takes its cue from the observation that jurisdiction - as the speech of law - articulates ...
The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from...
The aim of this article is to flesh out the implications of seeing universal jurisdiction as a claim...
Jurisdiction is the extent of a power. This gives rise to an important distinction. Jurisdictional e...
During the past decade we have witnessed a vast growth in the volume and variety of discretionary p...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
This Article makes sense of a lie. It shows how legal jurisdiction depends on a falsehood--and then ...
This Article explains why courts treat subject-matter jurisdiction as sacrosanct, demonstrates why t...
Over the last two decades, and culminating in a quartet of cases decided in the last two terms, the ...
Although it is not uncommon for a court to consider the question of whether an authority (or which a...
Jurisdiction is a composite term referring to that which is right (jus) and that which is said (dice...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
This Article challenges the conventional scholarly wisdom and contends that transient jurisdiction f...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
There is no doubt that in the days of procedural refinements, arbitrary distinctions and uncertainty...
This book takes its cue from the observation that jurisdiction - as the speech of law - articulates ...
The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from...
The aim of this article is to flesh out the implications of seeing universal jurisdiction as a claim...
Jurisdiction is the extent of a power. This gives rise to an important distinction. Jurisdictional e...
During the past decade we have witnessed a vast growth in the volume and variety of discretionary p...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
This Article makes sense of a lie. It shows how legal jurisdiction depends on a falsehood--and then ...
This Article explains why courts treat subject-matter jurisdiction as sacrosanct, demonstrates why t...
Over the last two decades, and culminating in a quartet of cases decided in the last two terms, the ...
Although it is not uncommon for a court to consider the question of whether an authority (or which a...
Jurisdiction is a composite term referring to that which is right (jus) and that which is said (dice...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
This Article challenges the conventional scholarly wisdom and contends that transient jurisdiction f...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
There is no doubt that in the days of procedural refinements, arbitrary distinctions and uncertainty...
This book takes its cue from the observation that jurisdiction - as the speech of law - articulates ...