The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from the merits. In this Article, Professor Lee challenges both those notions. Jurisdiction is more akin to legitimate authority than to power, and, as such, cannot be conceptually distinguished from the merits, which also ultimately pertain to legitimate authority. Professor Lee argues that courts should therefore abstain from the metaphysics of jurisdiction-they should always ask whether, all things considered, they should rule as a plaintiff asks, not whether they are capable of so ruling
The Supreme Court has never articulated a coherent theoretical justification for the law of personal...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
The law of jurisdiction and of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is confused. So ...
The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from...
This book takes its cue from the observation that jurisdiction - as the speech of law - articulates ...
Jurisdiction is the extent of a power. This gives rise to an important distinction. Jurisdictional e...
In an article entitled Jurisdiction and Its Effects, I argued that jurisdiction has inherent descrip...
This Article makes sense of a lie. It shows how legal jurisdiction depends on a falsehood--and then ...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
During the past decade we have witnessed a vast growth in the volume and variety of discretionary p...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
Jurisdiction is a composite term referring to that which is right (jus) and that which is said (dice...
The aim of this article is to flesh out the implications of seeing universal jurisdiction as a claim...
Although it is not uncommon for a court to consider the question of whether an authority (or which a...
Questions of jurisdiction have been central to Western legal traditions, yet finding a place within ...
The Supreme Court has never articulated a coherent theoretical justification for the law of personal...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
The law of jurisdiction and of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is confused. So ...
The conventional wisdom about jurisdiction is that it equals power and is conceptually distinct from...
This book takes its cue from the observation that jurisdiction - as the speech of law - articulates ...
Jurisdiction is the extent of a power. This gives rise to an important distinction. Jurisdictional e...
In an article entitled Jurisdiction and Its Effects, I argued that jurisdiction has inherent descrip...
This Article makes sense of a lie. It shows how legal jurisdiction depends on a falsehood--and then ...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
During the past decade we have witnessed a vast growth in the volume and variety of discretionary p...
For much of the history of the western legal order, jurisdiction has been the first question of law....
Jurisdiction is a composite term referring to that which is right (jus) and that which is said (dice...
The aim of this article is to flesh out the implications of seeing universal jurisdiction as a claim...
Although it is not uncommon for a court to consider the question of whether an authority (or which a...
Questions of jurisdiction have been central to Western legal traditions, yet finding a place within ...
The Supreme Court has never articulated a coherent theoretical justification for the law of personal...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
The law of jurisdiction and of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is confused. So ...