Add to ORKGThe expanding principle of indemnity has made it possible for tort-feasors to reallocate their risks and resulting liability. Discussing recent California decisions, the authors suggest the circumstances under which this concept may be applied
This Article discusses the effect of comparative fault principles upon contribution rights in Califo...
This Note will demonstrate that the Mahler court\u27s decision will lead to inefficient results, bec...
In 1956 the Supreme Court in Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. implied a warranty...
The expanding principle of indemnity has made it possible for tort-feasors to reallocate their risks...
Madawick Contracting Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 307 N.Y. 111, 120 N.E. 2d 520 (1954)
In PPG Industries, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance CO., the California Supreme Court held that an ins...
The California Supreme Court affirmed the court of appeals and adopted an “all-sums-with-stacking” i...
This article will revisit the history of assumption of risk in California and elsewhere and suggest ...
Under the case law culminating in Johansen v. California State Automobile Association, it is virtual...
Any discussion of California insurance decisions and developments in the past year must perforce sta...
This article examines the doctrine of implied indemnity in light of the recent decision of the Supre...
This article explores the distinction between the alternative explanations for the remedy of insuran...
The liability crisis of the mid-1980s has led to an extensive reexamination of the liability system....
article published in law journalCalabresi’s theory of tort liability (1961) as a risk distribution m...
Florida plaintiffs injured by the negligence of others face a familiar obstacle in our court system ...
This Article discusses the effect of comparative fault principles upon contribution rights in Califo...
This Note will demonstrate that the Mahler court\u27s decision will lead to inefficient results, bec...
In 1956 the Supreme Court in Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. implied a warranty...
The expanding principle of indemnity has made it possible for tort-feasors to reallocate their risks...
Madawick Contracting Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 307 N.Y. 111, 120 N.E. 2d 520 (1954)
In PPG Industries, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance CO., the California Supreme Court held that an ins...
The California Supreme Court affirmed the court of appeals and adopted an “all-sums-with-stacking” i...
This article will revisit the history of assumption of risk in California and elsewhere and suggest ...
Under the case law culminating in Johansen v. California State Automobile Association, it is virtual...
Any discussion of California insurance decisions and developments in the past year must perforce sta...
This article examines the doctrine of implied indemnity in light of the recent decision of the Supre...
This article explores the distinction between the alternative explanations for the remedy of insuran...
The liability crisis of the mid-1980s has led to an extensive reexamination of the liability system....
article published in law journalCalabresi’s theory of tort liability (1961) as a risk distribution m...
Florida plaintiffs injured by the negligence of others face a familiar obstacle in our court system ...
This Article discusses the effect of comparative fault principles upon contribution rights in Califo...
This Note will demonstrate that the Mahler court\u27s decision will lead to inefficient results, bec...
In 1956 the Supreme Court in Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. implied a warranty...