This Article discusses the effect of comparative fault principles upon contribution rights in California, including the impact on settlement and releases between the plaintiff and one of several joined concurrent tortfeasors. Using simple hypothetical case situations, the author emphasizes decisions and tactics that should be made by litigators in response to a variety of important contribution issues
This Article calls for the recognition of a comparative fault defense in contract law. Part I sets t...
Article 2212a of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes, the Comparative Negligence and Contribution Among...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
In American Motorcycle v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court failed to extend the pure s...
Plaintiffs are the masters of their own actions.\u27 They decide when, where, and whom to sue. Altho...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
This article examines the recently enacted Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act in Florida. Af...
The purpose of this Article is to reexamine and appropriately analyze the application of comparative...
The Article presents a comprehensive proposal for assigning liability in tort cases according to the...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.A century ago the common law doctrine of contri...
Adoption of comparative negligence gives juries the task of allocating fault between a plaintiff and...
All or nothing. For years this idea of absolutes has been a hallmark of tort law despite the inequit...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
The expanding principle of indemnity has made it possible for tort-feasors to reallocate their risks...
Recent decisions of the Florida district courts of appeal have engrafted inconsistent requirements o...
This Article calls for the recognition of a comparative fault defense in contract law. Part I sets t...
Article 2212a of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes, the Comparative Negligence and Contribution Among...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
In American Motorcycle v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court failed to extend the pure s...
Plaintiffs are the masters of their own actions.\u27 They decide when, where, and whom to sue. Altho...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
This article examines the recently enacted Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act in Florida. Af...
The purpose of this Article is to reexamine and appropriately analyze the application of comparative...
The Article presents a comprehensive proposal for assigning liability in tort cases according to the...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.A century ago the common law doctrine of contri...
Adoption of comparative negligence gives juries the task of allocating fault between a plaintiff and...
All or nothing. For years this idea of absolutes has been a hallmark of tort law despite the inequit...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
The expanding principle of indemnity has made it possible for tort-feasors to reallocate their risks...
Recent decisions of the Florida district courts of appeal have engrafted inconsistent requirements o...
This Article calls for the recognition of a comparative fault defense in contract law. Part I sets t...
Article 2212a of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes, the Comparative Negligence and Contribution Among...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...