In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue that the decision indicates a terminal stage of the development and application of the marketplace of ideas metaphor in First Amendment law. I argue that the good news about the Citizens United decision is that it sets the stage for the abolition of the commercial speech doctrine, which resulted in lower protection for commercial speech, as previously set forth in the 1980 Central Hudson decision. This is good news because the commercial speech doctrine has become a doctrinal anomaly that threatens to undermine the reach of First Amendment protections
There exists much insightful commentary on the commercial speech doctrine. Some of it debates whethe...
Government regulation of commercial enterprises takes many forms. Among the most familiar forms are...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...
In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue...
On May 24, 1976, the Supreme Court decided the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia ...
During the past 15 years, the U. S. Supreme Court has used Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Comm...
This article argues that after Bigelow and Virginia Board of Pharmacy, the constitutionality of regu...
Commercial speech doctrine is presently controversial and confused. The article seeks to clarify why...
After a quick summary of constitutional treatment of commercial speech, this essay outlines four rea...
The Supreme Court has long said that “the extension of First Amendment protection to commercial spee...
First Amendment jurisprudence incorporates a continual struggle to balance coflicting interests. Fre...
Commercial speech and core speech are fundamentally different, and the basis for their current First...
Only recently\u27 has the Supreme Court given First Amendment protection to commercial speech. Initi...
In 1942, the Supreme Court held that commercial speech was not protected by the First Amendment. Sin...
When it comes to the First Amendment, commerciality does, and should, matter. This Article develops ...
There exists much insightful commentary on the commercial speech doctrine. Some of it debates whethe...
Government regulation of commercial enterprises takes many forms. Among the most familiar forms are...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...
In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue...
On May 24, 1976, the Supreme Court decided the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia ...
During the past 15 years, the U. S. Supreme Court has used Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Comm...
This article argues that after Bigelow and Virginia Board of Pharmacy, the constitutionality of regu...
Commercial speech doctrine is presently controversial and confused. The article seeks to clarify why...
After a quick summary of constitutional treatment of commercial speech, this essay outlines four rea...
The Supreme Court has long said that “the extension of First Amendment protection to commercial spee...
First Amendment jurisprudence incorporates a continual struggle to balance coflicting interests. Fre...
Commercial speech and core speech are fundamentally different, and the basis for their current First...
Only recently\u27 has the Supreme Court given First Amendment protection to commercial speech. Initi...
In 1942, the Supreme Court held that commercial speech was not protected by the First Amendment. Sin...
When it comes to the First Amendment, commerciality does, and should, matter. This Article develops ...
There exists much insightful commentary on the commercial speech doctrine. Some of it debates whethe...
Government regulation of commercial enterprises takes many forms. Among the most familiar forms are...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...