In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue that the decision indicates a terminal stage of the development and application of the marketplace of ideas metaphor in First Amendment law. I argue that the good news about the Citizens United decision is that it sets the stage for the abolition of the commercial speech doctrine, which resulted in lower protection for commercial speech, as previously set forth in the 1980 Central Hudson decision. This is good news because the commercial speech doctrine has become a doctrinal anomaly that threatens to undermine the reach of First Amendment protections
If any area of constitutional law has been defined by a metaphor, the First Amendment is the area, a...
Commercial speech and core speech are fundamentally different, and the basis for their current First...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...
In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue...
Commercial speech doctrine is presently controversial and confused. The article seeks to clarify why...
During the past 15 years, the U. S. Supreme Court has used Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Comm...
On May 24, 1976, the Supreme Court decided the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia ...
This Article examines the constitutionality of regulating commercial speech. Keeping in mind traditi...
The extent to which the government should have the ability to regulate vice products and activitie...
There exists much insightful commentary on the commercial speech doctrine. Some of it debates whethe...
In this article, I seek to demonstrate that arguments made by scholars against First Amendment prote...
Although Citizens United has been roundly criticized for its potential effect on elections and its d...
When it comes to the First Amendment, commerciality does, and should, matter. This Article develops ...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate...
First Amendment jurisprudence incorporates a continual struggle to balance coflicting interests. Fre...
If any area of constitutional law has been defined by a metaphor, the First Amendment is the area, a...
Commercial speech and core speech are fundamentally different, and the basis for their current First...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...
In this article, I place the Citizens United decision in historical and doctrinal context, and argue...
Commercial speech doctrine is presently controversial and confused. The article seeks to clarify why...
During the past 15 years, the U. S. Supreme Court has used Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Comm...
On May 24, 1976, the Supreme Court decided the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia ...
This Article examines the constitutionality of regulating commercial speech. Keeping in mind traditi...
The extent to which the government should have the ability to regulate vice products and activitie...
There exists much insightful commentary on the commercial speech doctrine. Some of it debates whethe...
In this article, I seek to demonstrate that arguments made by scholars against First Amendment prote...
Although Citizens United has been roundly criticized for its potential effect on elections and its d...
When it comes to the First Amendment, commerciality does, and should, matter. This Article develops ...
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate...
First Amendment jurisprudence incorporates a continual struggle to balance coflicting interests. Fre...
If any area of constitutional law has been defined by a metaphor, the First Amendment is the area, a...
Commercial speech and core speech are fundamentally different, and the basis for their current First...
In this article, the Supreme Court\u27s shifting and expanding approach to intermediate scrutiny of ...