Scholars of higher education have long recognized that existing reward systems and structures in academic communities do not weight faculty professional service as they do teaching and research. This paper examines how four colleges and universities with exemplary programs for assessing service as scholarship implemented these policies within colleges of education. Case studies suggest that policies to assess service as scholarship can increase consistency among an institution’s service mission, faculty workload, and reward system; expand faculty’s views of scholarship; boost faculty satisfaction; and strengthen the quality of an institution’s service culture
The Chronicle of Higher Education Review (2/11/05) published an article on “Collaborative Efforts: P...
Higher education institutions in the United States grant academic tenure to junior faculty based on ...
In this report, we begin with an examination how engaged scholarship is presented in promotion and t...
Scholars of higher education have long recognized that existing reward systems and structures in aca...
KerryAnn O\u27Meara studied the practices of promotion and tenure committees assessing school of edu...
Institutions of higher education need to rethink the ways they recognize, support, evaluate and rewa...
Higher education institutions in the United States grant academic tenure to junior faculty based on...
While a growing body of scholarship has focused on the personal, professional, and organizational fa...
This paper attempts to marry two new ideas: the assessment of service as scholarship for promotion a...
Boyer’s (1990) groundbreaking work has identified that scholarship should have four separate yet ove...
In 1994 the New England Resource Center for Higher Education surveyed New England colleges and unive...
How important is service in the promotion and tenure process? Performance evaluations of faculty mem...
Boyer’s four forms of scholarship were detailed in his 1990 book Scholarship Reconsidered: Pri...
Systems for reappointment, promotion, and tenure of university faculty have long been part of most i...
Promotion and tenure are very important to faculty members, especially to faculty that are untenured...
The Chronicle of Higher Education Review (2/11/05) published an article on “Collaborative Efforts: P...
Higher education institutions in the United States grant academic tenure to junior faculty based on ...
In this report, we begin with an examination how engaged scholarship is presented in promotion and t...
Scholars of higher education have long recognized that existing reward systems and structures in aca...
KerryAnn O\u27Meara studied the practices of promotion and tenure committees assessing school of edu...
Institutions of higher education need to rethink the ways they recognize, support, evaluate and rewa...
Higher education institutions in the United States grant academic tenure to junior faculty based on...
While a growing body of scholarship has focused on the personal, professional, and organizational fa...
This paper attempts to marry two new ideas: the assessment of service as scholarship for promotion a...
Boyer’s (1990) groundbreaking work has identified that scholarship should have four separate yet ove...
In 1994 the New England Resource Center for Higher Education surveyed New England colleges and unive...
How important is service in the promotion and tenure process? Performance evaluations of faculty mem...
Boyer’s four forms of scholarship were detailed in his 1990 book Scholarship Reconsidered: Pri...
Systems for reappointment, promotion, and tenure of university faculty have long been part of most i...
Promotion and tenure are very important to faculty members, especially to faculty that are untenured...
The Chronicle of Higher Education Review (2/11/05) published an article on “Collaborative Efforts: P...
Higher education institutions in the United States grant academic tenure to junior faculty based on ...
In this report, we begin with an examination how engaged scholarship is presented in promotion and t...