Hanoch Dagan argues that the legal realists conceived of law as “a dynamic institution, or set of institutions, that embodies three constitutive tensions: between power and reason, between science and craft, and between tradition and progress.” One tension that Dagan mentions but does not emphasize sufficiently is the tension between adjudication and legislation. Understanding the ways judge-made common law influences legislation and the ways that statutes affect the development of common law will improve our understanding of legal reasoning, the rule of law, and the role of judges in a free and democratic society
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
Legal activity invariably takes place within some structure, however lax. No matter how often the im...
I argue that American legal realism as derived from Oliver Wendell Holmes\u27s prediction theory of ...
This paper explores the contribution by the contemporary legal realist Hanoch Dagan. Dagan’s brand o...
What did legal realism bring to the conflict of laws? Why was the realist critique of the received w...
A truly realistic theory of law – the possibility of which is examined in this work – should have th...
As the dominant approach to legal analysis in the United States today, Legal Realism is firmly ensco...
A current focus of legal debate is the proper role of the courts in the interpretation of statutes a...
It is difficult to argue with the ideal of transparency in law. Transparency in the operation and ef...
Published as Chapter 18 in Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought, Justin Desautels-Stein & Christ...
The condition that law and legal apparatus in all levels including judges, are imprisoned in fatal p...
Two new legal philosophies took shape in the 20th century, legal realism and legal interpretivism. L...
For an individual playing a social role to behave responsibly requires participation in a process th...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
The ultimate question posed by the realistic movement in American jurisprudence is whether the pract...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
Legal activity invariably takes place within some structure, however lax. No matter how often the im...
I argue that American legal realism as derived from Oliver Wendell Holmes\u27s prediction theory of ...
This paper explores the contribution by the contemporary legal realist Hanoch Dagan. Dagan’s brand o...
What did legal realism bring to the conflict of laws? Why was the realist critique of the received w...
A truly realistic theory of law – the possibility of which is examined in this work – should have th...
As the dominant approach to legal analysis in the United States today, Legal Realism is firmly ensco...
A current focus of legal debate is the proper role of the courts in the interpretation of statutes a...
It is difficult to argue with the ideal of transparency in law. Transparency in the operation and ef...
Published as Chapter 18 in Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought, Justin Desautels-Stein & Christ...
The condition that law and legal apparatus in all levels including judges, are imprisoned in fatal p...
Two new legal philosophies took shape in the 20th century, legal realism and legal interpretivism. L...
For an individual playing a social role to behave responsibly requires participation in a process th...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
The ultimate question posed by the realistic movement in American jurisprudence is whether the pract...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
Legal activity invariably takes place within some structure, however lax. No matter how often the im...
I argue that American legal realism as derived from Oliver Wendell Holmes\u27s prediction theory of ...