Two new legal philosophies took shape in the 20th century, legal realism and legal interpretivism. Legal realists are skeptical of law and the legal reasoning done in courts. Ronald Dworkin’s philosophy, legal interpretivism, views legal reasoning as part of the coherent narrative that justifies the role of law in society. The realist movement is often traced to the philosophy of Oliver Wendel Holmes, Jr., whose thinking bears similarities to that of Friedrich Nietzsche. Taking Jerome Frank’s philosophy as the epitome of legal realism, I consider whether Holmes or Nietzsche would accept the matured realist movement, or rather prefer legal interpretivism
From time to time there arises a school of legal thought which undertakesto make a clean sweep of th...
The ultimate question posed by the realistic movement in American jurisprudence is whether the pract...
In his informative and provocative Article, Understanding Legal Realism,\u27my colleague-to-be, Bria...
Two new legal philosophies took shape in the twentieth century, legal realism and legal interpretivi...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
The intellectual movement we call legal realism is today, I think, most often thought of as having a...
From time to time there arises a school of legal thought which undertakesto make a clean sweep of th...
As the dominant approach to legal analysis in the United States today, Legal Realism is firmly ensco...
From time to time there arises a school of legal thought which undertakesto make a clean sweep of th...
The ultimate question posed by the realistic movement in American jurisprudence is whether the pract...
In his informative and provocative Article, Understanding Legal Realism,\u27my colleague-to-be, Bria...
Two new legal philosophies took shape in the twentieth century, legal realism and legal interpretivi...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
The possibility of any meaningful relationship between the legal realists and natural law looks at f...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
The intellectual movement we call legal realism is today, I think, most often thought of as having a...
From time to time there arises a school of legal thought which undertakesto make a clean sweep of th...
As the dominant approach to legal analysis in the United States today, Legal Realism is firmly ensco...
From time to time there arises a school of legal thought which undertakesto make a clean sweep of th...
The ultimate question posed by the realistic movement in American jurisprudence is whether the pract...
In his informative and provocative Article, Understanding Legal Realism,\u27my colleague-to-be, Bria...