This review essay argues that Hanoch Dagan’s self-styled via media between functionalism and formalism is functionalism in another guise, not the synthesis it claims to be. More specifically, it examines Dagan’s claim to have vindicated, from a realist perspective, what may be called the three autonomies: judge-made law’s autonomy vis-à-vis politics, legal theory’s autonomy vis-à-vis other disciplines that study law, and private law’s autonomy vis-à-vis public law. And it argues in each case that the autonomy Dagan believes he has vindicated is illusory
Commenting and discussing some thesis about American Legal Realism exposed in Brian Leiter’s Legal P...
Book Review of Brian Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law Brian Z. Tamanaha has written extensively ...
This Article probes the philosophical and psychological attractions of formalism and suggests that i...
This paper explores the contribution by the contemporary legal realist Hanoch Dagan. Dagan’s brand o...
Hanoch Dagan argues that the legal realists conceived of law as “a dynamic institution, or set of in...
It is difficult to argue with the ideal of transparency in law. Transparency in the operation and ef...
This essay argues that the legal realists were romantics in the tradition of Ralph Waldo Emerson. It...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The article aims to pursue a reassessment of one fundamental binary opposition legal realism invokes...
Ronald Dworkin describes an approach to how courts should decide cases that he associates with Judge...
In Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence, Anthony Sebok traces the historical and philosophical...
Brian Z. Tamanaha has written extensively on realism in jurisprudence, but in his Realistic Theory o...
In his new book The Law and Ethics of Restitution, Hanoch Dagan undertakes to explain and justify th...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
After laying out a conventional account of the formalism vs. realism debates, this Article argues th...
Commenting and discussing some thesis about American Legal Realism exposed in Brian Leiter’s Legal P...
Book Review of Brian Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law Brian Z. Tamanaha has written extensively ...
This Article probes the philosophical and psychological attractions of formalism and suggests that i...
This paper explores the contribution by the contemporary legal realist Hanoch Dagan. Dagan’s brand o...
Hanoch Dagan argues that the legal realists conceived of law as “a dynamic institution, or set of in...
It is difficult to argue with the ideal of transparency in law. Transparency in the operation and ef...
This essay argues that the legal realists were romantics in the tradition of Ralph Waldo Emerson. It...
The main goal of this essay is to explain in what sense “we are all realists now.” It examines vario...
The article aims to pursue a reassessment of one fundamental binary opposition legal realism invokes...
Ronald Dworkin describes an approach to how courts should decide cases that he associates with Judge...
In Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence, Anthony Sebok traces the historical and philosophical...
Brian Z. Tamanaha has written extensively on realism in jurisprudence, but in his Realistic Theory o...
In his new book The Law and Ethics of Restitution, Hanoch Dagan undertakes to explain and justify th...
American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons e...
After laying out a conventional account of the formalism vs. realism debates, this Article argues th...
Commenting and discussing some thesis about American Legal Realism exposed in Brian Leiter’s Legal P...
Book Review of Brian Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law Brian Z. Tamanaha has written extensively ...
This Article probes the philosophical and psychological attractions of formalism and suggests that i...