We study the impact of manipulating the attention of a decision-maker who learns sequentially about a number of items before making a choice. Under natural assumptions on the decision-maker's strategy, directing attention toward one item increases its likelihood of being chosen regardless of its value. This result applies when the decision-maker can reject all items in favor of an outside option with known value; if no outside option is available, the direction of the effect of manipulation depends on the value of the item
International audienceIn this paper, I propose a model of rational inattention where the choice vari...
In rational choice theory, individuals are assumed always to choose the op-tion that will provide th...
Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such err...
We study the impact of manipulating the attention of a decision-maker who learns sequentially about ...
We solve a general class of dynamic rational-inattention problems in which an agent repeatedly acqui...
Models of rational inattention allow agents to make mistakes in their actions while assuming they do...
Decision inertia is the tendency to repeat previous choices independently of the outcome, which can ...
Decision inertia is the tendency to repeat previous choices independently of the outcome, which can ...
We use laboratory experiments to test models of 'rational inattention', in which people acquire info...
Economists have studied for a long time how decision-makers allocate scarce re-sources. The recent l...
Rationally inattentive decision-making (RIDM) extends general problem of Bayesian decision-making un...
People tend to discount rewards or losses that occur in the future. Such delay discounting has been ...
<div><p>Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that ...
Individuals must often choose among discrete actions with imperfect information about their payoffs....
We study the response of consumption and saving decisions of rationally inattentive individuals to c...
International audienceIn this paper, I propose a model of rational inattention where the choice vari...
In rational choice theory, individuals are assumed always to choose the op-tion that will provide th...
Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such err...
We study the impact of manipulating the attention of a decision-maker who learns sequentially about ...
We solve a general class of dynamic rational-inattention problems in which an agent repeatedly acqui...
Models of rational inattention allow agents to make mistakes in their actions while assuming they do...
Decision inertia is the tendency to repeat previous choices independently of the outcome, which can ...
Decision inertia is the tendency to repeat previous choices independently of the outcome, which can ...
We use laboratory experiments to test models of 'rational inattention', in which people acquire info...
Economists have studied for a long time how decision-makers allocate scarce re-sources. The recent l...
Rationally inattentive decision-making (RIDM) extends general problem of Bayesian decision-making un...
People tend to discount rewards or losses that occur in the future. Such delay discounting has been ...
<div><p>Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that ...
Individuals must often choose among discrete actions with imperfect information about their payoffs....
We study the response of consumption and saving decisions of rationally inattentive individuals to c...
International audienceIn this paper, I propose a model of rational inattention where the choice vari...
In rational choice theory, individuals are assumed always to choose the op-tion that will provide th...
Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such err...