The natural language frequency of a word is known to influence the ability to perform recognition judgments based on either semantic or episodic memory, an effect commonly known as the word frequency effect (WFE). For episodic recognition specifically, the WFE presents a mirrored pattern with higher hit rates and lower false alarm rates for low frequency words compared to high frequency words. Interestingly, the use of certain study tasks such as judgements of concreteness has been shown to reduce or even abolish the hit rate advantage of low frequency words. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that prior exposure to an unrelated lexical decision task leads to a modulation of the WFE in a subsequent episodic recognition test. Resu...
Empirical tests were conducted on theelevated-attention hypothesis that low-frequency (LF) words are...
In a lexical decision paradigm subjects viewed character strings and indicated if they were true wor...
K. J. Malmberg, J. Holden, and R. M. Shiffrin (2004) reported more false alarms for low- than high-f...
The normative frequency of words is empirically related to performance of a variety of memory tasks,...
Two experiments investigated Estes and Maddox’ theory (2002) that word frequency mirror effect in ep...
The word-frequency mirror effect (more hits and fewer false alarms for low-frequency than for high-f...
Estes and Maddox (2002) suggested that the word frequency mirror effect in episodic recognition memo...
The word frequency paradox refers to the finding that low frequency words are better recognized than...
Judgments of learning (JOLs) are usually higher for high-frequency words than for low-frequency word...
One of the major tasks facing cognitive psychologists is to understand how humans recognise words. M...
Dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect posit that low-frequency words are recollect...
The present study is interested in whether recognition memory errors made from snap decisions can be...
We investigate the effects of word characteristics on episodic recognition memory using analyses tha...
Word frequency (WF) and strength effects are two important phenomena associated with episodic memory...
The word frequency mirror effect is a robust phenomenon in episodic memory whereby recognition accur...
Empirical tests were conducted on theelevated-attention hypothesis that low-frequency (LF) words are...
In a lexical decision paradigm subjects viewed character strings and indicated if they were true wor...
K. J. Malmberg, J. Holden, and R. M. Shiffrin (2004) reported more false alarms for low- than high-f...
The normative frequency of words is empirically related to performance of a variety of memory tasks,...
Two experiments investigated Estes and Maddox’ theory (2002) that word frequency mirror effect in ep...
The word-frequency mirror effect (more hits and fewer false alarms for low-frequency than for high-f...
Estes and Maddox (2002) suggested that the word frequency mirror effect in episodic recognition memo...
The word frequency paradox refers to the finding that low frequency words are better recognized than...
Judgments of learning (JOLs) are usually higher for high-frequency words than for low-frequency word...
One of the major tasks facing cognitive psychologists is to understand how humans recognise words. M...
Dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect posit that low-frequency words are recollect...
The present study is interested in whether recognition memory errors made from snap decisions can be...
We investigate the effects of word characteristics on episodic recognition memory using analyses tha...
Word frequency (WF) and strength effects are two important phenomena associated with episodic memory...
The word frequency mirror effect is a robust phenomenon in episodic memory whereby recognition accur...
Empirical tests were conducted on theelevated-attention hypothesis that low-frequency (LF) words are...
In a lexical decision paradigm subjects viewed character strings and indicated if they were true wor...
K. J. Malmberg, J. Holden, and R. M. Shiffrin (2004) reported more false alarms for low- than high-f...