Add to ORKGIn this Article, the author discusses how the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in State Farm v. Campbell reformed the reprehensibility analysis and how this reformation may have the perhaps unintended consequence of eliminating the practice of awarding total harm damages. In particular, in an effort to limit the size of individual punitive damage awards, Campbell limits the use of evidence of conduct directed at parties not before the court
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
The doctrine of punitive damages truly is an ancient legal concept that inexplicably has evaded comm...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
This Article focuses on the third guidepost announced in BMW v. Gore for reviewing whether the amoun...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
Punitive damages occupy a special place in the U.S. legal system. Courts award them in very few case...
In this Article, Professors Chanenson and Gotanda propose that courts treat comparable maximum crimi...
Part I of this article will trace the development of the evolving principles and requirements the Co...
In Philip Morris v. Williams, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not permit the impos...
This Article analyzes the likely impact of recent Supreme Court jurisprudence applying substantive a...
It is finally over. The Supreme Court’s incursion into punitive damages jurisprudence has unceremoni...
In 2003, the Supreme Court created a presumption that only single-digit ratios of punitive damages t...
Almost twenty years ago, the Supreme Court in BMW v. Gore invoked the Due Process Clause for the fir...
In State Farm v. Campbell, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the punitive damages awarded in a partic...
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
The doctrine of punitive damages truly is an ancient legal concept that inexplicably has evaded comm...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
This Article focuses on the third guidepost announced in BMW v. Gore for reviewing whether the amoun...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
Punitive damages occupy a special place in the U.S. legal system. Courts award them in very few case...
In this Article, Professors Chanenson and Gotanda propose that courts treat comparable maximum crimi...
Part I of this article will trace the development of the evolving principles and requirements the Co...
In Philip Morris v. Williams, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not permit the impos...
This Article analyzes the likely impact of recent Supreme Court jurisprudence applying substantive a...
It is finally over. The Supreme Court’s incursion into punitive damages jurisprudence has unceremoni...
In 2003, the Supreme Court created a presumption that only single-digit ratios of punitive damages t...
Almost twenty years ago, the Supreme Court in BMW v. Gore invoked the Due Process Clause for the fir...
In State Farm v. Campbell, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the punitive damages awarded in a partic...
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
The doctrine of punitive damages truly is an ancient legal concept that inexplicably has evaded comm...