This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compensatory damages for harms caused by the defendant to persons other than the plaintiff. The author concludes that punitive damages are a poor device for redressing harms caused to persons not a party to the action. Once punitive damages seek to address concerns beyond the plaintiff and the defendant, they raise a series of problems that defy rationalization. This article urges that we not take punitive damages as so great a good that we run roughshod over dues process in our zeal to preserve them
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
Criminal restitution is a core component of punishment. In its current form, this remedy rarely serv...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., suggested that...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
Criminal restitution is a core component of punishment. In its current form, this remedy rarely serv...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
Criminal restitution is a core component of punishment. In its current form, this remedy rarely serv...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., suggested that...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
Criminal restitution is a core component of punishment. In its current form, this remedy rarely serv...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
Criminal restitution is a core component of punishment. In its current form, this remedy rarely serv...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. suggested that,...