We propose that dispersed outside ownership and the resulting managerial discretion come with costs but also with benefits. Even when tight control by shareholders is ex post efficient, it constitutes ex ante an expropriation threat that reduces managerial initiative and noncontractible investments. In addition, we show that equity implements state contingent control, a feature usually associated with debt. Finally, we demonstrate that monitoring, and hence ownership concentration, may conflict with performance-based incentive schemes
for his helpful comments. We study how internal and external corporate governance mechanisms jointly...
Non-controlling large shareholders play an important role in corporate governance in emerging market...
We critically reassess the notion that high liquid asset holding by firms faced with weak investor p...
We propose that dispersed outside ownership and the resulting managerial discretion come with costs ...
If ownership and control are separated, leaving the manager with discretion may be of value. This pa...
Governance and finance literature warns that majority shareholders can extract private benefits of c...
We theoretically and empirically address the endogeneity of corporate ownership structure and the co...
ACL-1International audienceWe study ownership dynamics when the manager and the large shareholder, b...
This paper analyses the interaction between legal shareholder protection, managerial incentives, and...
The bulk of corporate governance theory examines the agency problems that arise from two extreme own...
Building on the ‘law and economics ’ literature, this paper analyses corporate governance implicatio...
This paper examines the linkage between the use of outside directors and managerial ownership. We co...
The corporate governance literature generally assumes that shareholders' incentives to monitor manag...
In this paper, we examine whether the presence of multiple large shareholders alleviates firm’s agen...
Do large shareholders monitor firms on behalf of minority shareholders, or share control with other ...
for his helpful comments. We study how internal and external corporate governance mechanisms jointly...
Non-controlling large shareholders play an important role in corporate governance in emerging market...
We critically reassess the notion that high liquid asset holding by firms faced with weak investor p...
We propose that dispersed outside ownership and the resulting managerial discretion come with costs ...
If ownership and control are separated, leaving the manager with discretion may be of value. This pa...
Governance and finance literature warns that majority shareholders can extract private benefits of c...
We theoretically and empirically address the endogeneity of corporate ownership structure and the co...
ACL-1International audienceWe study ownership dynamics when the manager and the large shareholder, b...
This paper analyses the interaction between legal shareholder protection, managerial incentives, and...
The bulk of corporate governance theory examines the agency problems that arise from two extreme own...
Building on the ‘law and economics ’ literature, this paper analyses corporate governance implicatio...
This paper examines the linkage between the use of outside directors and managerial ownership. We co...
The corporate governance literature generally assumes that shareholders' incentives to monitor manag...
In this paper, we examine whether the presence of multiple large shareholders alleviates firm’s agen...
Do large shareholders monitor firms on behalf of minority shareholders, or share control with other ...
for his helpful comments. We study how internal and external corporate governance mechanisms jointly...
Non-controlling large shareholders play an important role in corporate governance in emerging market...
We critically reassess the notion that high liquid asset holding by firms faced with weak investor p...