Building on the ‘law and economics ’ literature, this paper analyses corporate governance implications of debt financing in an environment where a dominant owner is able to extract ex ante ‘private benefits of control’. Ownership concentration may result in lower efficiency, measured as a ratio of a firm’s debt to investment, and this effect depends on the identity of the largest shareholder. Moreover, entrenched dominant shareholder(s) may be colluding with fixed-claim holders in extracting ‘control premium’. One of possible outcomes is a ‘crowding out ’ of entrepreneurial firms from the debt market, and this i
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
This article identifies an important channel through which excess control rights affect firm value. ...
We theoretically and empirically address the endogeneity of corporate ownership structure and the co...
Controlled firms are in a framework where private benefits create a buffer between public earnings a...
Corporate law is dominated by an equity-only view of corporate governance that centers on management...
If ownership and control are separated, leaving the manager with discretion may be of value. This pa...
Prior research has often taken the view that entrenched managers tend to avoid debt. Contrary to thi...
Ownership concentration as a governance mechanism has received considerable attention among academic...
Debt is not frequently analyzed in relation to the conflict between controlling and outside sharehol...
Previous studies on the agency model of the firm extensively recognize the managerial ownership and ...
Debt is not frequently analyzed in relation to the conflict between controlling and outside sharehol...
This thesis sets out the empirical evidence on complex ownership and control using data for UK liste...
The aim of this study is to investigate whether ownership concentration, debt and firm value should ...
Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between insiders ownership concentration and firms...
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
This article identifies an important channel through which excess control rights affect firm value. ...
We theoretically and empirically address the endogeneity of corporate ownership structure and the co...
Controlled firms are in a framework where private benefits create a buffer between public earnings a...
Corporate law is dominated by an equity-only view of corporate governance that centers on management...
If ownership and control are separated, leaving the manager with discretion may be of value. This pa...
Prior research has often taken the view that entrenched managers tend to avoid debt. Contrary to thi...
Ownership concentration as a governance mechanism has received considerable attention among academic...
Debt is not frequently analyzed in relation to the conflict between controlling and outside sharehol...
Previous studies on the agency model of the firm extensively recognize the managerial ownership and ...
Debt is not frequently analyzed in relation to the conflict between controlling and outside sharehol...
This thesis sets out the empirical evidence on complex ownership and control using data for UK liste...
The aim of this study is to investigate whether ownership concentration, debt and firm value should ...
Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between insiders ownership concentration and firms...
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
Debt may help to manage type II corporate agency conflicts because it is easier for controlling shar...
This article identifies an important channel through which excess control rights affect firm value. ...